Arapaho vs Guatemalan Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 27,429,012 people shows a near-perfect negative correlation between the proportion of Guatemalans within Arapaho communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.924. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Arapaho within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.689% in Guatemalans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Arapaho corresponds to a decrease of 689.1 Guatemalans.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Arapaho and Guatemalan communities in the United States are seen in householder income under 25 years ($44,003 compared to $51,525, a difference of 17.1%), per capita income ($32,345 compared to $37,766, a difference of 16.8%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($75,945 compared to $87,705, a difference of 15.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (23.5% compared to 22.6%, a difference of 3.7%), median family income ($82,064 compared to $88,295, a difference of 7.6%), and householder income over 65 years ($59,383 compared to $54,526, a difference of 8.9%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Arapaho and Guatemalan communities in the United States are seen in single male poverty (21.9% compared to 13.8%, a difference of 59.4%), single father poverty (24.0% compared to 16.6%, a difference of 44.1%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (25.2% compared to 20.7%, a difference of 21.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of child poverty among girls under 16 (21.7% compared to 21.4%, a difference of 1.6%), single mother poverty (33.4% compared to 32.9%, a difference of 1.6%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (20.8% compared to 21.2%, a difference of 1.8%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Arapaho and Guatemalan communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (19.0% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 119.8%), unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (15.4% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 115.4%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (12.8% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 114.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.8% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 0.11%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.3% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 6.1%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.1% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 9.1%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Arapaho and Guatemalan communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 25-29 (76.6% compared to 83.7%, a difference of 9.3%), in labor force | age 35-44 (78.1% compared to 83.0%, a difference of 6.3%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (74.4% compared to 78.7%, a difference of 5.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (73.8% compared to 75.3%, a difference of 2.1%), in labor force | age 30-34 (81.5% compared to 83.7%, a difference of 2.8%), and in labor force | age 16-19 (37.3% compared to 35.5%, a difference of 5.0%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Arapaho and Guatemalan communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (47.1% compared to 37.1%, a difference of 26.9%), divorced or separated (14.8% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 21.8%), and family households with children (25.6% compared to 28.9%, a difference of 13.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (66.5% compared to 65.2%, a difference of 1.9%), single father households (2.9% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 2.1%), and married-couple households (41.8% compared to 43.3%, a difference of 3.4%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Arapaho and Guatemalan communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (7.4% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 49.5%), 4 or more vehicles in household (9.4% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 34.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (26.4% compared to 20.1%, a difference of 31.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.7% compared to 89.2%, a difference of 4.0%), 2 or more vehicles in household (60.2% compared to 54.1%, a difference of 11.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (26.4% compared to 20.1%, a difference of 31.8%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Arapaho and Guatemalan communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.1% compared to 3.5%, a difference of 64.3%), doctorate degree (1.2% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 21.0%), and professional degree (2.9% compared to 3.5%, a difference of 20.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.6% compared to 96.6%, a difference of 2.1%), kindergarten (98.6% compared to 96.5%, a difference of 2.1%), and 1st grade (98.6% compared to 96.5%, a difference of 2.2%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Arapaho and Guatemalan communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (4.1% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 47.6%), disability age 35 to 64 (15.1% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 29.1%), and male disability (13.3% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 20.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (49.8% compared to 49.0%, a difference of 1.6%), self-care disability (2.6% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 2.9%), and disability age under 5 (1.3% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 3.9%).