Arapaho vs Nicaraguan Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 24,374,601 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of Nicaraguans within Arapaho communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.791. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Arapaho within a typical geography, there is an increase of 2.246% in Nicaraguans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Arapaho corresponds to an increase of 2,246.4 Nicaraguans.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Arapaho and Nicaraguan communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($71,697 compared to $87,751, a difference of 22.4%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($75,945 compared to $92,554, a difference of 21.9%), and per capita income ($32,345 compared to $39,372, a difference of 21.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (23.5% compared to 23.4%, a difference of 0.14%), householder income over 65 years ($59,383 compared to $54,474, a difference of 9.0%), and median family income ($82,064 compared to $92,231, a difference of 12.4%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Arapaho and Nicaraguan communities in the United States are seen in single male poverty (21.9% compared to 12.4%, a difference of 77.1%), single father poverty (24.0% compared to 15.9%, a difference of 50.8%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (25.2% compared to 18.1%, a difference of 39.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple family poverty (6.6% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 1.9%), child poverty among boys under 16 (20.2% compared to 18.4%, a difference of 9.9%), and single mother poverty (33.4% compared to 29.8%, a difference of 12.0%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Arapaho and Nicaraguan communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (19.0% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 163.2%), unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (15.4% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 134.1%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (12.8% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 130.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.1% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 1.2%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.3% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 6.4%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.8% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 13.5%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Arapaho and Nicaraguan communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (37.3% compared to 32.4%, a difference of 15.0%), in labor force | age 25-29 (76.6% compared to 83.1%, a difference of 8.5%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (78.1% compared to 84.1%, a difference of 7.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (73.8% compared to 73.2%, a difference of 0.85%), in labor force | age 30-34 (81.5% compared to 83.9%, a difference of 3.0%), and in labor force | age > 16 (62.1% compared to 65.1%, a difference of 4.8%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Arapaho and Nicaraguan communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (47.1% compared to 36.6%, a difference of 28.7%), divorced or separated (14.8% compared to 13.0%, a difference of 13.9%), and family households with children (25.6% compared to 28.4%, a difference of 11.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (66.5% compared to 67.4%, a difference of 1.3%), single mother households (7.1% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 1.8%), and married-couple households (41.8% compared to 45.2%, a difference of 8.1%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Arapaho and Nicaraguan communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (9.4% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 34.5%), no vehicles in household (7.4% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 31.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (26.4% compared to 20.7%, a difference of 27.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.7% compared to 90.4%, a difference of 2.5%), 2 or more vehicles in household (60.2% compared to 56.1%, a difference of 7.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (26.4% compared to 20.7%, a difference of 27.8%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Arapaho and Nicaraguan communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.1% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 39.7%), professional degree (2.9% compared to 3.9%, a difference of 36.9%), and doctorate degree (1.2% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 28.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of college, 1 year or more (54.1% compared to 53.9%, a difference of 0.47%), nursery school (98.6% compared to 97.1%, a difference of 1.6%), and kindergarten (98.6% compared to 97.0%, a difference of 1.6%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Arapaho and Nicaraguan communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (4.1% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 52.3%), disability age 35 to 64 (15.1% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 47.5%), and male disability (13.3% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 24.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (16.8% compared to 17.0%, a difference of 0.72%), self-care disability (2.6% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 1.0%), and disability age over 75 (49.8% compared to 48.3%, a difference of 3.2%).