Arapaho vs Immigrants from Latin America Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 29,645,096 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Latin America within Arapaho communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.289. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Arapaho within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.079% in Immigrants from Latin America. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Arapaho corresponds to a decrease of 79.0 Immigrants from Latin America.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Arapaho and Immigrants from Latin America communities in the United States are seen in householder income under 25 years ($44,003 compared to $51,387, a difference of 16.8%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($75,945 compared to $87,219, a difference of 14.8%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($71,697 compared to $82,166, a difference of 14.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (23.5% compared to 23.7%, a difference of 1.1%), median family income ($82,064 compared to $86,989, a difference of 6.0%), and median household income ($67,965 compared to $75,420, a difference of 11.0%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Arapaho and Immigrants from Latin America communities in the United States are seen in single male poverty (21.9% compared to 13.5%, a difference of 62.2%), single father poverty (24.0% compared to 16.4%, a difference of 46.3%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (25.2% compared to 19.7%, a difference of 27.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of child poverty under the age of 16 (20.8% compared to 20.5%, a difference of 1.3%), child poverty among boys under 16 (20.2% compared to 20.6%, a difference of 2.3%), and single mother poverty (33.4% compared to 32.4%, a difference of 3.1%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Arapaho and Immigrants from Latin America communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (19.0% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 121.8%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (12.8% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 108.5%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (15.4% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 107.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.8% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 0.27%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.3% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 6.2%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.1% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 11.2%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Arapaho and Immigrants from Latin America communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (37.3% compared to 33.9%, a difference of 9.9%), in labor force | age 25-29 (76.6% compared to 82.9%, a difference of 8.3%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (78.1% compared to 82.8%, a difference of 6.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (73.8% compared to 74.1%, a difference of 0.37%), in labor force | age 30-34 (81.5% compared to 83.1%, a difference of 2.0%), and in labor force | age > 16 (62.1% compared to 64.8%, a difference of 4.3%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Arapaho and Immigrants from Latin America communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (47.1% compared to 37.1%, a difference of 26.8%), divorced or separated (14.8% compared to 12.4%, a difference of 19.3%), and family households with children (25.6% compared to 29.7%, a difference of 16.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (66.5% compared to 67.2%, a difference of 1.1%), single father households (2.9% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 4.0%), and average family size (3.64 compared to 3.42, a difference of 6.2%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Arapaho and Immigrants from Latin America communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (7.4% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 40.9%), 4 or more vehicles in household (9.4% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 31.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (26.4% compared to 20.5%, a difference of 28.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.7% compared to 89.8%, a difference of 3.2%), 2 or more vehicles in household (60.2% compared to 54.3%, a difference of 10.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (26.4% compared to 20.5%, a difference of 28.7%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Arapaho and Immigrants from Latin America communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.1% compared to 3.3%, a difference of 56.2%), professional degree (2.9% compared to 3.3%, a difference of 14.7%), and bachelor's degree (26.6% compared to 30.1%, a difference of 12.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.6% compared to 96.7%, a difference of 1.9%), kindergarten (98.6% compared to 96.7%, a difference of 2.0%), and 1st grade (98.6% compared to 96.7%, a difference of 2.0%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Arapaho and Immigrants from Latin America communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (4.1% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 46.3%), disability age 35 to 64 (15.1% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 31.1%), and male disability (13.3% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 19.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of self-care disability (2.6% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 0.21%), disability age over 75 (49.8% compared to 49.5%, a difference of 0.57%), and disability age under 5 (1.3% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 4.1%).