Arapaho vs Potawatomi Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 18,786,321 people shows a perfect positive correlation between the proportion of Potawatomi within Arapaho communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.976. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Arapaho within a typical geography, there is an increase of 13.800% in Potawatomi. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Arapaho corresponds to an increase of 13,800.0 Potawatomi.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Arapaho and Potawatomi communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (23.5% compared to 27.7%, a difference of 18.1%), per capita income ($32,345 compared to $38,046, a difference of 17.6%), and median male earnings ($41,758 compared to $48,768, a difference of 16.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($44,003 compared to $46,462, a difference of 5.6%), median household income ($67,965 compared to $72,576, a difference of 6.8%), and median family income ($82,064 compared to $88,265, a difference of 7.6%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Arapaho and Potawatomi communities in the United States are seen in single male poverty (21.9% compared to 15.8%, a difference of 39.1%), single father poverty (24.0% compared to 18.9%, a difference of 26.9%), and family poverty (12.7% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 23.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother poverty (33.4% compared to 34.1%, a difference of 2.1%), child poverty among boys under 16 (20.2% compared to 19.4%, a difference of 4.2%), and single female poverty (26.4% compared to 25.4%, a difference of 4.2%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Arapaho and Potawatomi communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (15.4% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 116.7%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (12.8% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 112.5%), and male unemployment (11.0% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 106.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.3% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 2.6%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.1% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 3.0%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.8% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 8.7%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Arapaho and Potawatomi communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 25-29 (76.6% compared to 82.9%, a difference of 8.3%), in labor force | age 16-19 (37.3% compared to 40.0%, a difference of 7.4%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (78.1% compared to 82.7%, a difference of 5.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (62.1% compared to 62.8%, a difference of 1.1%), in labor force | age 30-34 (81.5% compared to 82.8%, a difference of 1.6%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (73.8% compared to 76.2%, a difference of 3.3%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Arapaho and Potawatomi communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (47.1% compared to 36.2%, a difference of 30.0%), single father households (2.9% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 15.1%), and average family size (3.64 compared to 3.16, a difference of 14.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (66.5% compared to 63.3%, a difference of 5.0%), family households with children (25.6% compared to 26.9%, a difference of 5.1%), and single mother households (7.1% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 7.7%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Arapaho and Potawatomi communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (9.4% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 28.5%), 3 or more vehicles in household (26.4% compared to 21.9%, a difference of 21.0%), and no vehicles in household (7.4% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 20.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.7% compared to 91.3%, a difference of 1.5%), 2 or more vehicles in household (60.2% compared to 58.0%, a difference of 3.9%), and no vehicles in household (7.4% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 20.3%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Arapaho and Potawatomi communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.2% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 33.8%), professional degree (2.9% compared to 3.6%, a difference of 23.8%), and master's degree (10.0% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 20.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 10th grade (94.2% compared to 94.3%, a difference of 0.10%), 7th grade (96.8% compared to 96.7%, a difference of 0.12%), and 8th grade (96.6% compared to 96.4%, a difference of 0.15%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Arapaho and Potawatomi communities in the United States are seen in disability age 5 to 17 (4.7% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 38.0%), disability age 18 to 34 (7.1% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 15.5%), and female disability (13.0% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 8.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of self-care disability (2.6% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 0.20%), hearing disability (4.1% compared to 4.1%, a difference of 0.72%), and vision disability (2.6% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 1.5%).