Arapaho vs Immigrants from Asia Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 29,566,579 people shows a substantial negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Asia within Arapaho communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.566. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Arapaho within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.285% in Immigrants from Asia. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Arapaho corresponds to a decrease of 284.5 Immigrants from Asia.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Arapaho and Immigrants from Asia communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($71,697 compared to $110,787, a difference of 54.5%), per capita income ($32,345 compared to $49,741, a difference of 53.8%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($75,945 compared to $116,566, a difference of 53.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income over 65 years ($59,383 compared to $67,594, a difference of 13.8%), wage/income gap (23.5% compared to 27.0%, a difference of 14.9%), and householder income under 25 years ($44,003 compared to $56,379, a difference of 28.1%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Arapaho and Immigrants from Asia communities in the United States are seen in single male poverty (21.9% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 92.7%), single father poverty (24.0% compared to 14.7%, a difference of 62.7%), and child poverty under the age of 5 (23.1% compared to 14.4%, a difference of 60.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.7% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 4.1%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.6% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 10.0%), and single mother poverty (33.4% compared to 26.3%, a difference of 27.1%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Arapaho and Immigrants from Asia communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (19.0% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 180.8%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (12.8% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 148.7%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (15.4% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 141.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.3% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 3.1%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.1% compared to 8.3%, a difference of 3.2%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.8% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 9.9%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Arapaho and Immigrants from Asia communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 25-29 (76.6% compared to 84.8%, a difference of 10.7%), in labor force | age 16-19 (37.3% compared to 34.1%, a difference of 9.2%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (78.1% compared to 84.5%, a difference of 8.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (73.8% compared to 73.6%, a difference of 0.26%), in labor force | age 30-34 (81.5% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 4.3%), and in labor force | age > 16 (62.1% compared to 66.1%, a difference of 6.4%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Arapaho and Immigrants from Asia communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (47.1% compared to 26.8%, a difference of 75.9%), single father households (2.9% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 39.1%), and divorced or separated (14.8% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 38.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (66.5% compared to 66.1%, a difference of 0.64%), average family size (3.64 compared to 3.27, a difference of 11.2%), and family households with children (25.6% compared to 28.8%, a difference of 12.8%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Arapaho and Immigrants from Asia communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (7.4% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 47.8%), 4 or more vehicles in household (9.4% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 38.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (26.4% compared to 20.2%, a difference of 30.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.7% compared to 89.3%, a difference of 3.9%), 2 or more vehicles in household (60.2% compared to 56.3%, a difference of 6.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (26.4% compared to 20.2%, a difference of 30.7%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Arapaho and Immigrants from Asia communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.2% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 107.9%), professional degree (2.9% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 91.5%), and master's degree (10.0% compared to 18.4%, a difference of 84.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 11th grade (92.4% compared to 92.4%, a difference of 0.020%), high school diploma (88.6% compared to 89.3%, a difference of 0.78%), and 10th grade (94.2% compared to 93.4%, a difference of 0.88%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Arapaho and Immigrants from Asia communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (15.1% compared to 9.5%, a difference of 58.9%), hearing disability (4.1% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 51.2%), and vision disability (2.6% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 36.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (16.8% compared to 16.8%, a difference of 0.29%), disability age 5 to 17 (4.7% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 2.4%), and disability age over 75 (49.8% compared to 47.0%, a difference of 5.9%).