Arapaho vs Immigrants from Malaysia Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 22,336,657 people shows a perfect positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Malaysia within Arapaho communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 1.000. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Arapaho within a typical geography, there is an increase of 1.749% in Immigrants from Malaysia. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Arapaho corresponds to an increase of 1,748.6 Immigrants from Malaysia.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Arapaho and Immigrants from Malaysia communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($32,345 compared to $49,983, a difference of 54.5%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($71,697 compared to $107,650, a difference of 50.1%), and median male earnings ($41,758 compared to $62,121, a difference of 48.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income over 65 years ($59,383 compared to $65,497, a difference of 10.3%), wage/income gap (23.5% compared to 26.3%, a difference of 12.1%), and householder income under 25 years ($44,003 compared to $54,179, a difference of 23.1%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Arapaho and Immigrants from Malaysia communities in the United States are seen in single male poverty (21.9% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 83.2%), single father poverty (24.0% compared to 15.2%, a difference of 57.7%), and family poverty (12.7% compared to 8.5%, a difference of 49.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.7% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 3.0%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.6% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 6.2%), and single mother poverty (33.4% compared to 27.3%, a difference of 22.5%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Arapaho and Immigrants from Malaysia communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (19.0% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 197.8%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (12.8% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 152.5%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (15.4% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 144.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.1% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 2.6%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.3% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 4.3%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.8% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 11.3%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Arapaho and Immigrants from Malaysia communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 25-29 (76.6% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 11.0%), in labor force | age 16-19 (37.3% compared to 34.3%, a difference of 8.7%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (78.1% compared to 84.6%, a difference of 8.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (73.8% compared to 73.3%, a difference of 0.62%), in labor force | age 30-34 (81.5% compared to 85.1%, a difference of 4.4%), and in labor force | age > 16 (62.1% compared to 66.1%, a difference of 6.4%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Arapaho and Immigrants from Malaysia communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (47.1% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 72.2%), single father households (2.9% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 41.9%), and divorced or separated (14.8% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 35.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (66.5% compared to 64.0%, a difference of 3.9%), family households with children (25.6% compared to 27.9%, a difference of 9.2%), and average family size (3.64 compared to 3.22, a difference of 12.9%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Arapaho and Immigrants from Malaysia communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (7.4% compared to 13.6%, a difference of 84.9%), 4 or more vehicles in household (9.4% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 58.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (26.4% compared to 18.3%, a difference of 44.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.7% compared to 86.5%, a difference of 7.2%), 2 or more vehicles in household (60.2% compared to 52.7%, a difference of 14.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (26.4% compared to 18.3%, a difference of 44.6%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Arapaho and Immigrants from Malaysia communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.2% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 119.7%), professional degree (2.9% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 98.7%), and master's degree (10.0% compared to 18.9%, a difference of 89.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 11th grade (92.4% compared to 92.4%, a difference of 0.030%), 10th grade (94.2% compared to 93.5%, a difference of 0.72%), and high school diploma (88.6% compared to 89.3%, a difference of 0.84%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Arapaho and Immigrants from Malaysia communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (15.1% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 54.5%), hearing disability (4.1% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 51.5%), and vision disability (2.6% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 35.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (16.8% compared to 17.1%, a difference of 1.6%), disability age 5 to 17 (4.7% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 4.7%), and disability age over 75 (49.8% compared to 46.4%, a difference of 7.4%).