Arapaho vs Ute Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 14,480,204 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Ute within Arapaho communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.212. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Arapaho within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.006% in Ute. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Arapaho corresponds to a decrease of 5.6 Ute.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Arapaho and Ute communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (23.5% compared to 27.8%, a difference of 18.4%), median male earnings ($41,758 compared to $48,899, a difference of 17.1%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($71,697 compared to $82,166, a difference of 14.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median household income ($67,965 compared to $72,402, a difference of 6.5%), median family income ($82,064 compared to $87,596, a difference of 6.7%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($75,945 compared to $83,937, a difference of 10.5%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Arapaho and Ute communities in the United States are seen in single male poverty (21.9% compared to 15.7%, a difference of 39.9%), single father poverty (24.0% compared to 18.5%, a difference of 29.6%), and male poverty (15.1% compared to 16.2%, a difference of 7.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty (17.5% compared to 17.5%, a difference of 0.16%), child poverty among girls under 16 (21.7% compared to 21.8%, a difference of 0.28%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (17.8% compared to 17.9%, a difference of 0.60%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Arapaho and Ute communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (19.0% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 193.8%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (16.8% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 140.5%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (15.4% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 124.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.8% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 11.9%), unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (6.1% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 17.1%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.1% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 18.4%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Arapaho and Ute communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 25-29 (76.6% compared to 80.8%, a difference of 5.5%), in labor force | age 30-34 (81.5% compared to 78.9%, a difference of 3.2%), and in labor force | age > 16 (62.1% compared to 60.9%, a difference of 2.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (73.8% compared to 73.8%, a difference of 0.0%), in labor force | age 16-19 (37.3% compared to 37.1%, a difference of 0.46%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (77.1% compared to 76.6%, a difference of 0.60%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Arapaho and Ute communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (47.1% compared to 33.0%, a difference of 42.7%), divorced or separated (14.8% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 17.2%), and family households with children (25.6% compared to 28.2%, a difference of 10.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother households (7.1% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 0.090%), single father households (2.9% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 2.1%), and family households (66.5% compared to 64.3%, a difference of 3.3%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Arapaho and Ute communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (7.4% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 57.8%), 3 or more vehicles in household (26.4% compared to 22.7%, a difference of 16.7%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (9.4% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 6.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.7% compared to 88.7%, a difference of 4.5%), 2 or more vehicles in household (60.2% compared to 56.6%, a difference of 6.5%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (9.4% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 6.8%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Arapaho and Ute communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.2% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 72.7%), professional degree (2.9% compared to 4.0%, a difference of 39.8%), and master's degree (10.0% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 17.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of college, under 1 year (60.3% compared to 60.2%, a difference of 0.18%), nursery school (98.6% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.40%), and kindergarten (98.6% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.41%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Arapaho and Ute communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.3% compared to 0.86%, a difference of 47.8%), ambulatory disability (7.1% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 19.0%), and hearing disability (4.1% compared to 3.5%, a difference of 18.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 18 to 34 (7.1% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 2.1%), cognitive disability (16.8% compared to 17.3%, a difference of 2.6%), and disability age 65 to 74 (28.1% compared to 27.3%, a difference of 2.9%).