Arapaho vs Immigrants from Congo Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 14,221,391 people shows a perfect positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Congo within Arapaho communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 1.000. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Arapaho within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.551% in Immigrants from Congo. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Arapaho corresponds to an increase of 551.4 Immigrants from Congo.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Arapaho and Immigrants from Congo communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($59,383 compared to $51,393, a difference of 15.5%), per capita income ($32,345 compared to $35,720, a difference of 10.4%), and median female earnings ($31,489 compared to $34,317, a difference of 9.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median family income ($82,064 compared to $82,216, a difference of 0.19%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($71,697 compared to $72,178, a difference of 0.67%), and householder income under 25 years ($44,003 compared to $43,266, a difference of 1.7%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Arapaho and Immigrants from Congo communities in the United States are seen in single male poverty (21.9% compared to 13.9%, a difference of 58.1%), single father poverty (24.0% compared to 15.4%, a difference of 55.8%), and child poverty among boys under 16 (20.2% compared to 22.4%, a difference of 11.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of receiving food stamps (14.1% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 0.31%), female poverty (17.5% compared to 17.4%, a difference of 0.48%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.6% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 0.70%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Arapaho and Immigrants from Congo communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (12.8% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 152.9%), unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (15.4% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 139.3%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (19.0% compared to 8.5%, a difference of 124.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.3% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 16.9%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.1% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 19.7%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.8% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 23.2%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Arapaho and Immigrants from Congo communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (37.3% compared to 41.7%, a difference of 11.9%), in labor force | age 25-29 (76.6% compared to 84.2%, a difference of 10.0%), and in labor force | age > 16 (62.1% compared to 67.1%, a difference of 8.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (81.5% compared to 84.6%, a difference of 3.8%), in labor force | age 20-24 (73.8% compared to 77.4%, a difference of 4.9%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (77.1% compared to 81.6%, a difference of 5.8%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Arapaho and Immigrants from Congo communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (47.1% compared to 36.8%, a difference of 28.1%), single father households (2.9% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 14.8%), and single mother households (7.1% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 14.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of currently married (40.5% compared to 41.1%, a difference of 1.3%), family households with children (25.6% compared to 27.3%, a difference of 6.8%), and married-couple households (41.8% compared to 39.0%, a difference of 7.1%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Arapaho and Immigrants from Congo communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (9.4% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 78.1%), 3 or more vehicles in household (26.4% compared to 17.0%, a difference of 55.8%), and no vehicles in household (7.4% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 36.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.7% compared to 90.0%, a difference of 3.0%), 2 or more vehicles in household (60.2% compared to 52.1%, a difference of 15.6%), and no vehicles in household (7.4% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 36.8%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Arapaho and Immigrants from Congo communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.2% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 36.6%), professional degree (2.9% compared to 3.6%, a difference of 26.7%), and master's degree (10.0% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 26.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of ged/equivalency (82.8% compared to 83.1%, a difference of 0.39%), nursery school (98.6% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 1.0%), and kindergarten (98.6% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 1.1%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Arapaho and Immigrants from Congo communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (4.1% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 42.9%), disability age 5 to 17 (4.7% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 30.7%), and disability age under 5 (1.3% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 19.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 18 to 34 (7.1% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 0.050%), disability age over 75 (49.8% compared to 48.7%, a difference of 2.2%), and female disability (13.0% compared to 12.7%, a difference of 3.1%).