Arapaho vs Turkish Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 23,639,273 people shows a moderate negative correlation between the proportion of Turks within Arapaho communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.473. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Arapaho within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.020% in Turks. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Arapaho corresponds to a decrease of 19.9 Turks.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Arapaho and Turkish communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($32,345 compared to $52,391, a difference of 62.0%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($75,945 compared to $117,814, a difference of 55.1%), and median male earnings ($41,758 compared to $64,253, a difference of 53.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income over 65 years ($59,383 compared to $68,037, a difference of 14.6%), wage/income gap (23.5% compared to 27.7%, a difference of 18.0%), and householder income under 25 years ($44,003 compared to $54,266, a difference of 23.3%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Arapaho and Turkish communities in the United States are seen in single male poverty (21.9% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 81.4%), family poverty (12.7% compared to 7.5%, a difference of 68.5%), and child poverty among girls under 16 (21.7% compared to 13.7%, a difference of 58.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.7% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 9.0%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.6% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 16.3%), and single mother poverty (33.4% compared to 26.4%, a difference of 26.5%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Arapaho and Turkish communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (19.0% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 170.4%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (12.8% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 152.2%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (15.4% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 148.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.3% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 3.6%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.1% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 6.8%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.8% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 9.8%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Arapaho and Turkish communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 25-29 (76.6% compared to 85.6%, a difference of 11.8%), in labor force | age 35-44 (78.1% compared to 85.1%, a difference of 9.0%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (77.1% compared to 83.8%, a difference of 8.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (73.8% compared to 73.9%, a difference of 0.21%), in labor force | age 30-34 (81.5% compared to 85.7%, a difference of 5.1%), and in labor force | age 16-19 (37.3% compared to 35.4%, a difference of 5.2%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Arapaho and Turkish communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (47.1% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 71.6%), single father households (2.9% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 46.9%), and divorced or separated (14.8% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 32.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (66.5% compared to 63.6%, a difference of 4.5%), family households with children (25.6% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 7.3%), and married-couple households (41.8% compared to 47.8%, a difference of 14.4%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Arapaho and Turkish communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (9.4% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 60.6%), no vehicles in household (7.4% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 58.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (26.4% compared to 18.4%, a difference of 43.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.7% compared to 88.4%, a difference of 4.9%), 2 or more vehicles in household (60.2% compared to 54.3%, a difference of 11.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (26.4% compared to 18.4%, a difference of 43.4%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Arapaho and Turkish communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.2% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 128.5%), professional degree (2.9% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 115.9%), and master's degree (10.0% compared to 19.9%, a difference of 99.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 8th grade (96.6% compared to 96.5%, a difference of 0.070%), 9th grade (95.7% compared to 95.8%, a difference of 0.080%), and 7th grade (96.8% compared to 96.7%, a difference of 0.10%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Arapaho and Turkish communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (15.1% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 56.1%), hearing disability (4.1% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 47.5%), and vision disability (2.6% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 36.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (16.8% compared to 16.9%, a difference of 0.53%), disability age 5 to 17 (4.7% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 7.7%), and disability age over 75 (49.8% compared to 45.7%, a difference of 9.1%).