Arapaho vs African Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 28,629,481 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Africans within Arapaho communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.421. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Arapaho within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.503% in Africans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Arapaho corresponds to an increase of 502.8 Africans.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Arapaho and African communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($32,345 compared to $37,785, a difference of 16.8%), median female earnings ($31,489 compared to $36,530, a difference of 16.0%), and median male earnings ($41,758 compared to $47,994, a difference of 14.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (23.5% compared to 22.9%, a difference of 2.3%), householder income under 25 years ($44,003 compared to $46,838, a difference of 6.4%), and median household income ($67,965 compared to $72,650, a difference of 6.9%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Arapaho and African communities in the United States are seen in single male poverty (21.9% compared to 14.7%, a difference of 48.9%), single father poverty (24.0% compared to 18.3%, a difference of 30.9%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (25.2% compared to 22.8%, a difference of 10.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother poverty (33.4% compared to 33.3%, a difference of 0.48%), child poverty among girls under 16 (21.7% compared to 21.9%, a difference of 0.87%), and child poverty under the age of 5 (23.1% compared to 22.8%, a difference of 1.3%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Arapaho and African communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (19.0% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 107.7%), unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (15.4% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 101.1%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (12.8% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 99.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.3% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 0.43%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.8% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 7.0%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.1% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 12.8%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Arapaho and African communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 25-29 (76.6% compared to 83.2%, a difference of 8.7%), in labor force | age 35-44 (78.1% compared to 82.9%, a difference of 6.2%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (74.4% compared to 77.9%, a difference of 4.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (73.8% compared to 75.0%, a difference of 1.6%), in labor force | age 16-19 (37.3% compared to 38.0%, a difference of 1.9%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (81.5% compared to 83.4%, a difference of 2.3%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Arapaho and African communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (47.1% compared to 39.7%, a difference of 18.6%), single father households (2.9% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 18.3%), and single mother households (7.1% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 15.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple households (41.8% compared to 40.9%, a difference of 2.1%), currently married (40.5% compared to 41.8%, a difference of 3.2%), and family households with children (25.6% compared to 27.2%, a difference of 6.2%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Arapaho and African communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (7.4% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 67.6%), 4 or more vehicles in household (9.4% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 60.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (26.4% compared to 18.2%, a difference of 45.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.7% compared to 87.8%, a difference of 5.6%), 2 or more vehicles in household (60.2% compared to 51.8%, a difference of 16.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (26.4% compared to 18.2%, a difference of 45.5%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Arapaho and African communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.2% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 34.4%), master's degree (10.0% compared to 12.9%, a difference of 28.9%), and professional degree (2.9% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 27.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.6% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.78%), ged/equivalency (82.8% compared to 83.4%, a difference of 0.78%), and kindergarten (98.6% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.79%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Arapaho and African communities in the United States are seen in disability age 5 to 17 (4.7% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 37.1%), hearing disability (4.1% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 36.2%), and disability age 35 to 64 (15.1% compared to 13.6%, a difference of 10.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability (13.2% compared to 13.0%, a difference of 1.6%), ambulatory disability (7.1% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 1.9%), and disability age over 75 (49.8% compared to 48.9%, a difference of 2.0%).