Arapaho vs Immigrants from Jamaica Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 22,991,207 people shows a substantial negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Jamaica within Arapaho communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.590. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Arapaho within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.054% in Immigrants from Jamaica. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Arapaho corresponds to a decrease of 53.8 Immigrants from Jamaica.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Arapaho and Immigrants from Jamaica communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (23.5% compared to 18.8%, a difference of 24.6%), median female earnings ($31,489 compared to $38,625, a difference of 22.7%), and per capita income ($32,345 compared to $38,766, a difference of 19.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median family income ($82,064 compared to $89,268, a difference of 8.8%), householder income over 65 years ($59,383 compared to $54,027, a difference of 9.9%), and median household income ($67,965 compared to $75,851, a difference of 11.6%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Arapaho and Immigrants from Jamaica communities in the United States are seen in single male poverty (21.9% compared to 13.0%, a difference of 69.1%), single father poverty (24.0% compared to 17.2%, a difference of 39.5%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (25.2% compared to 18.9%, a difference of 33.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of child poverty among boys under 16 (20.2% compared to 20.1%, a difference of 0.38%), child poverty under the age of 16 (20.8% compared to 19.8%, a difference of 4.9%), and married-couple family poverty (6.6% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 5.6%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Arapaho and Immigrants from Jamaica communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (19.0% compared to 8.9%, a difference of 113.7%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (12.8% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 95.8%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (15.4% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 90.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.3% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 3.2%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.8% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 3.4%), and unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (13.8% compared to 13.0%, a difference of 6.4%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Arapaho and Immigrants from Jamaica communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (37.3% compared to 32.2%, a difference of 15.7%), in labor force | age 25-29 (76.6% compared to 83.8%, a difference of 9.4%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (78.1% compared to 84.6%, a difference of 8.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (73.8% compared to 72.4%, a difference of 1.9%), in labor force | age 30-34 (81.5% compared to 84.3%, a difference of 3.5%), and in labor force | age > 16 (62.1% compared to 64.7%, a difference of 4.1%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Arapaho and Immigrants from Jamaica communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.9% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 24.1%), births to unmarried women (47.1% compared to 38.8%, a difference of 21.4%), and single mother households (7.1% compared to 8.4%, a difference of 17.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of currently married (40.5% compared to 41.1%, a difference of 1.5%), family households (66.5% compared to 64.7%, a difference of 2.8%), and married-couple households (41.8% compared to 40.7%, a difference of 2.9%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Arapaho and Immigrants from Jamaica communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (9.4% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 111.9%), no vehicles in household (7.4% compared to 14.2%, a difference of 93.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (26.4% compared to 14.7%, a difference of 80.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.7% compared to 85.8%, a difference of 8.0%), 2 or more vehicles in household (60.2% compared to 44.5%, a difference of 35.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (26.4% compared to 14.7%, a difference of 80.2%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Arapaho and Immigrants from Jamaica communities in the United States are seen in master's degree (10.0% compared to 13.0%, a difference of 30.4%), professional degree (2.9% compared to 3.6%, a difference of 24.1%), and bachelor's degree (26.6% compared to 32.9%, a difference of 23.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of college, 1 year or more (54.1% compared to 54.2%, a difference of 0.020%), ged/equivalency (82.8% compared to 82.9%, a difference of 0.21%), and college, under 1 year (60.3% compared to 59.7%, a difference of 1.1%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Arapaho and Immigrants from Jamaica communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (4.1% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 58.5%), disability age 5 to 17 (4.7% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 29.0%), and disability age 35 to 64 (15.1% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 28.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of self-care disability (2.6% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 2.9%), female disability (13.0% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 3.3%), and disability age under 5 (1.3% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 3.4%).