Arapaho vs Fijian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 13,883,900 people shows a perfect positive correlation between the proportion of Fijians within Arapaho communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 1.000. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Arapaho within a typical geography, there is an increase of 2.028% in Fijians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Arapaho corresponds to an increase of 2,028.2 Fijians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Arapaho and Fijian communities in the United States are seen in householder income under 25 years ($44,003 compared to $50,132, a difference of 13.9%), per capita income ($32,345 compared to $36,690, a difference of 13.4%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($75,945 compared to $85,187, a difference of 12.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (23.5% compared to 22.9%, a difference of 2.4%), householder income over 65 years ($59,383 compared to $56,768, a difference of 4.6%), and median family income ($82,064 compared to $87,387, a difference of 6.5%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Arapaho and Fijian communities in the United States are seen in single male poverty (21.9% compared to 13.8%, a difference of 58.9%), single father poverty (24.0% compared to 15.7%, a difference of 52.9%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (25.2% compared to 20.0%, a difference of 25.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother poverty (33.4% compared to 31.6%, a difference of 5.6%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.7% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 7.9%), and receiving food stamps (14.1% compared to 13.0%, a difference of 8.4%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Arapaho and Fijian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (12.8% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 155.0%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (16.8% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 154.3%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (15.4% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 149.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.1% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 8.1%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.3% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 23.8%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.8% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 29.1%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Arapaho and Fijian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (37.3% compared to 40.4%, a difference of 8.5%), in labor force | age 25-29 (76.6% compared to 82.9%, a difference of 8.3%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (78.1% compared to 82.9%, a difference of 6.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (81.5% compared to 83.4%, a difference of 2.4%), in labor force | age 45-54 (77.1% compared to 80.2%, a difference of 4.1%), and in labor force | age > 16 (62.1% compared to 64.8%, a difference of 4.3%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Arapaho and Fijian communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (47.1% compared to 32.3%, a difference of 46.0%), divorced or separated (14.8% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 17.3%), and currently married (40.5% compared to 46.3%, a difference of 14.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (66.5% compared to 65.9%, a difference of 0.87%), single mother households (7.1% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 1.2%), and single father households (2.9% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 3.5%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Arapaho and Fijian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (7.4% compared to 9.5%, a difference of 29.4%), 4 or more vehicles in household (9.4% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 19.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (26.4% compared to 22.2%, a difference of 19.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.7% compared to 90.5%, a difference of 2.4%), 2 or more vehicles in household (60.2% compared to 57.6%, a difference of 4.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (26.4% compared to 22.2%, a difference of 19.0%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Arapaho and Fijian communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.1% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 17.8%), bachelor's degree (26.6% compared to 28.7%, a difference of 7.9%), and college, 1 year or more (54.1% compared to 51.3%, a difference of 5.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.6% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 1.1%), kindergarten (98.6% compared to 97.5%, a difference of 1.1%), and 1st grade (98.6% compared to 97.5%, a difference of 1.1%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Arapaho and Fijian communities in the United States are seen in disability age 5 to 17 (4.7% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 19.3%), hearing disability (4.1% compared to 3.5%, a difference of 17.5%), and disability age 35 to 64 (15.1% compared to 13.2%, a difference of 13.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female disability (13.0% compared to 13.1%, a difference of 0.44%), disability age 18 to 34 (7.1% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 1.0%), and disability age over 75 (49.8% compared to 49.0%, a difference of 1.6%).