Arapaho vs Subsaharan African Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 29,271,024 people shows a mild negative correlation between the proportion of Sub-Saharan Africans within Arapaho communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.385. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Arapaho within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.014% in Sub-Saharan Africans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Arapaho corresponds to a decrease of 13.8 Sub-Saharan Africans.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Arapaho and Subsaharan African communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($32,345 compared to $40,152, a difference of 24.1%), median female earnings ($31,489 compared to $38,391, a difference of 21.9%), and median male earnings ($41,758 compared to $50,408, a difference of 20.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (23.5% compared to 22.8%, a difference of 2.8%), householder income over 65 years ($59,383 compared to $56,615, a difference of 4.9%), and householder income under 25 years ($44,003 compared to $48,691, a difference of 10.6%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Arapaho and Subsaharan African communities in the United States are seen in single male poverty (21.9% compared to 13.7%, a difference of 60.2%), single father poverty (24.0% compared to 16.9%, a difference of 41.6%), and family poverty (12.7% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 16.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of receiving food stamps (14.1% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 0.12%), child poverty among boys under 16 (20.2% compared to 20.0%, a difference of 0.99%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.6% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 3.8%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Arapaho and Subsaharan African communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (19.0% compared to 8.4%, a difference of 125.8%), unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (15.4% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 114.2%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (12.8% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 113.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.3% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 0.88%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.8% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 7.1%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.1% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 13.9%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Arapaho and Subsaharan African communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 25-29 (76.6% compared to 84.3%, a difference of 10.1%), in labor force | age 35-44 (78.1% compared to 84.1%, a difference of 7.7%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (74.4% compared to 79.3%, a difference of 6.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (73.8% compared to 75.7%, a difference of 2.6%), in labor force | age 16-19 (37.3% compared to 38.4%, a difference of 3.2%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (81.5% compared to 84.5%, a difference of 3.7%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Arapaho and Subsaharan African communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (47.1% compared to 36.7%, a difference of 28.5%), single father households (2.9% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 18.9%), and divorced or separated (14.8% compared to 12.7%, a difference of 16.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple households (41.8% compared to 41.6%, a difference of 0.52%), currently married (40.5% compared to 42.6%, a difference of 5.0%), and family households (66.5% compared to 62.1%, a difference of 7.1%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Arapaho and Subsaharan African communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (7.4% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 66.1%), 4 or more vehicles in household (9.4% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 63.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (26.4% compared to 17.9%, a difference of 48.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.7% compared to 87.9%, a difference of 5.5%), 2 or more vehicles in household (60.2% compared to 51.9%, a difference of 16.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (26.4% compared to 17.9%, a difference of 48.1%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Arapaho and Subsaharan African communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.2% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 51.3%), professional degree (2.9% compared to 4.1%, a difference of 42.5%), and master's degree (10.0% compared to 14.2%, a difference of 42.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 12th grade, no diploma (90.5% compared to 90.1%, a difference of 0.46%), 11th grade (92.4% compared to 91.7%, a difference of 0.72%), and high school diploma (88.6% compared to 87.9%, a difference of 0.73%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Arapaho and Subsaharan African communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (4.1% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 44.0%), disability age 5 to 17 (4.7% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 30.0%), and disability age 35 to 64 (15.1% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 19.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 18 to 34 (7.1% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 0.70%), female disability (13.0% compared to 12.7%, a difference of 2.5%), and disability age under 5 (1.3% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 2.8%).