Arapaho vs Luxembourger Community Comparison

COMPARE

Arapaho
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Luxembourger
Race
Ancestry
AfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAmericanApacheArabArgentineanArmenianAustralianAustrianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCanadianCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ik
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfricaArgentinaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSerbiaSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayVenezuelaVietnamWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern Europe
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Arapaho

Luxembourgers

Fair
Excellent
2,537
SOCIAL INDEX
22.9/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
252nd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
9,215
SOCIAL INDEX
89.6/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
27th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Luxembourger Integration in Arapaho Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 19,384,219 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Luxembourgers within Arapaho communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.467. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Arapaho within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.149% in Luxembourgers. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Arapaho corresponds to an increase of 149.0 Luxembourgers.
Arapaho Integration in Luxembourger Communities

Arapaho vs Luxembourger Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Arapaho and Luxembourger communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($32,345 compared to $45,663, a difference of 41.2%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($75,945 compared to $103,536, a difference of 36.3%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($71,697 compared to $97,237, a difference of 35.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income over 65 years ($59,383 compared to $60,967, a difference of 2.7%), householder income under 25 years ($44,003 compared to $50,379, a difference of 14.5%), and wage/income gap (23.5% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 16.9%).
Arapaho vs Luxembourger Income
Income MetricArapahoLuxembourger
Per Capita Income
Tragic
$32,345
Exceptional
$45,663
Median Family Income
Tragic
$82,064
Excellent
$106,183
Median Household Income
Tragic
$67,965
Good
$86,418
Median Earnings
Tragic
$36,586
Excellent
$47,640
Median Male Earnings
Tragic
$41,758
Excellent
$56,300
Median Female Earnings
Tragic
$31,489
Average
$39,891
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Tragic
$44,003
Tragic
$50,379
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Tragic
$71,697
Excellent
$97,237
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Tragic
$75,945
Excellent
$103,536
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Poor
$59,383
Average
$60,967
Wage/Income Gap
Exceptional
23.5%
Tragic
27.4%

Arapaho vs Luxembourger Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Arapaho and Luxembourger communities in the United States are seen in family poverty (12.7% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 75.2%), married-couple family poverty (6.6% compared to 3.9%, a difference of 69.3%), and single male poverty (21.9% compared to 13.4%, a difference of 64.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother poverty (33.4% compared to 28.5%, a difference of 17.2%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.7% compared to 10.8%, a difference of 17.7%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (25.2% compared to 20.9%, a difference of 20.6%).
Arapaho vs Luxembourger Poverty
Poverty MetricArapahoLuxembourger
Poverty
Tragic
16.3%
Exceptional
10.6%
Families
Tragic
12.7%
Exceptional
7.2%
Males
Tragic
15.1%
Exceptional
9.5%
Females
Tragic
17.5%
Exceptional
11.6%
Females 18 to 24 years
Tragic
25.2%
Tragic
20.9%
Females 25 to 34 years
Tragic
17.8%
Exceptional
12.1%
Children Under 5 years
Tragic
23.1%
Exceptional
14.9%
Children Under 16 years
Tragic
20.8%
Exceptional
13.6%
Boys Under 16 years
Tragic
20.2%
Exceptional
13.8%
Girls Under 16 years
Tragic
21.7%
Exceptional
14.3%
Single Males
Tragic
21.9%
Tragic
13.4%
Single Females
Tragic
26.4%
Excellent
20.4%
Single Fathers
Tragic
24.0%
Tragic
17.1%
Single Mothers
Tragic
33.4%
Excellent
28.5%
Married Couples
Tragic
6.6%
Exceptional
3.9%
Seniors Over 65 years
Tragic
11.6%
Exceptional
9.2%
Seniors Over 75 years
Poor
12.7%
Exceptional
10.8%
Receiving Food Stamps
Tragic
14.1%
Exceptional
9.1%

Arapaho vs Luxembourger Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Arapaho and Luxembourger communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (19.0% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 187.1%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (12.8% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 166.5%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (15.4% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 146.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.1% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 4.8%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.3% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 8.5%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.8% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 12.2%).
Arapaho vs Luxembourger Unemployment
Unemployment MetricArapahoLuxembourger
Unemployment
Tragic
9.8%
Exceptional
4.3%
Males
Tragic
11.0%
Exceptional
4.5%
Females
Tragic
8.8%
Exceptional
4.4%
Youth < 25
Tragic
16.3%
Exceptional
10.0%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Tragic
25.2%
Exceptional
15.1%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Tragic
13.8%
Exceptional
9.1%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Tragic
15.4%
Exceptional
6.2%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Tragic
12.8%
Exceptional
4.8%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Tragic
10.3%
Exceptional
4.3%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Tragic
7.5%
Exceptional
4.2%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Tragic
6.1%
Exceptional
4.5%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Tragic
6.3%
Exceptional
4.3%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
5.8%
Exceptional
5.2%
Seniors > 65
Tragic
5.3%
Exceptional
4.8%
Seniors > 75
Exceptional
8.1%
Exceptional
7.7%
Women w/ Children < 6
Tragic
19.0%
Exceptional
6.6%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Tragic
16.8%
Exceptional
8.3%
Women w/ Children < 18
Tragic
9.2%
Exceptional
5.0%

Arapaho vs Luxembourger Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Arapaho and Luxembourger communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (37.3% compared to 45.3%, a difference of 21.5%), in labor force | age 25-29 (76.6% compared to 86.9%, a difference of 13.5%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (78.1% compared to 86.4%, a difference of 10.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (81.5% compared to 86.6%, a difference of 6.3%), in labor force | age 20-24 (73.8% compared to 79.0%, a difference of 7.0%), and in labor force | age > 16 (62.1% compared to 66.7%, a difference of 7.4%).
Arapaho vs Luxembourger Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricArapahoLuxembourger
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Tragic
62.1%
Exceptional
66.7%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Tragic
74.4%
Exceptional
81.9%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Excellent
37.3%
Exceptional
45.3%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Tragic
73.8%
Exceptional
79.0%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Tragic
76.6%
Exceptional
86.9%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Tragic
81.5%
Exceptional
86.6%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Tragic
78.1%
Exceptional
86.4%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Tragic
77.1%
Exceptional
85.0%

Arapaho vs Luxembourger Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Arapaho and Luxembourger communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (47.1% compared to 29.4%, a difference of 60.1%), divorced or separated (14.8% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 30.6%), and single father households (2.9% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 30.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (66.5% compared to 63.3%, a difference of 5.1%), family households with children (25.6% compared to 27.0%, a difference of 5.7%), and married-couple households (41.8% compared to 48.5%, a difference of 15.9%).
Arapaho vs Luxembourger Family Structure
Family Structure MetricArapahoLuxembourger
Family Households
Exceptional
66.5%
Tragic
63.3%
Family Households with Children
Tragic
25.6%
Tragic
27.0%
Married-couple Households
Tragic
41.8%
Exceptional
48.5%
Average Family Size
Exceptional
3.64
Tragic
3.10
Single Father Households
Tragic
2.9%
Exceptional
2.2%
Single Mother Households
Tragic
7.1%
Exceptional
5.6%
Currently Married
Tragic
40.5%
Exceptional
49.3%
Divorced or Separated
Tragic
14.8%
Exceptional
11.3%
Births to Unmarried Women
Tragic
47.1%
Exceptional
29.4%

Arapaho vs Luxembourger Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Arapaho and Luxembourger communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (9.4% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 41.2%), no vehicles in household (7.4% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 37.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (26.4% compared to 20.9%, a difference of 26.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2 or more vehicles in household (60.2% compared to 59.1%, a difference of 2.0%), 1 or more vehicles in household (92.7% compared to 94.8%, a difference of 2.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (26.4% compared to 20.9%, a difference of 26.7%).
Arapaho vs Luxembourger Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricArapahoLuxembourger
No Vehicles Available
Exceptional
7.4%
Exceptional
5.4%
1+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
92.7%
Exceptional
94.8%
2+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
60.2%
Exceptional
59.1%
3+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
26.4%
Exceptional
20.9%
4+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
9.4%
Excellent
6.6%

Arapaho vs Luxembourger Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Arapaho and Luxembourger communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.2% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 66.0%), professional degree (2.9% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 60.6%), and master's degree (10.0% compared to 15.3%, a difference of 53.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 3rd grade (98.4% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.050%), 4th grade (98.1% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.070%), and 5th grade (98.0% compared to 98.1%, a difference of 0.070%).
Arapaho vs Luxembourger Education Level
Education Level MetricArapahoLuxembourger
No Schooling Completed
Average
2.1%
Exceptional
1.6%
Nursery School
Exceptional
98.6%
Exceptional
98.5%
Kindergarten
Exceptional
98.6%
Exceptional
98.5%
1st Grade
Exceptional
98.6%
Exceptional
98.5%
2nd Grade
Exceptional
98.5%
Exceptional
98.4%
3rd Grade
Exceptional
98.4%
Exceptional
98.3%
4th Grade
Exceptional
98.1%
Exceptional
98.2%
5th Grade
Exceptional
98.0%
Exceptional
98.1%
6th Grade
Exceptional
97.8%
Exceptional
97.9%
7th Grade
Exceptional
96.8%
Exceptional
97.2%
8th Grade
Exceptional
96.6%
Exceptional
97.0%
9th Grade
Exceptional
95.7%
Exceptional
96.3%
10th Grade
Exceptional
94.2%
Exceptional
95.4%
11th Grade
Fair
92.4%
Exceptional
94.5%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Tragic
90.5%
Exceptional
93.3%
High School Diploma
Poor
88.6%
Exceptional
91.7%
GED/Equivalency
Tragic
82.8%
Exceptional
88.6%
College, Under 1 year
Tragic
60.3%
Exceptional
68.2%
College, 1 year or more
Tragic
54.1%
Exceptional
62.1%
Associate's Degree
Tragic
36.7%
Exceptional
48.9%
Bachelor's Degree
Tragic
26.6%
Excellent
39.8%
Master's Degree
Tragic
10.0%
Good
15.3%
Professional Degree
Tragic
2.9%
Good
4.6%
Doctorate Degree
Tragic
1.2%
Excellent
1.9%

Arapaho vs Luxembourger Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Arapaho and Luxembourger communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (15.1% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 42.3%), vision disability (2.6% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 34.6%), and disability age 65 to 74 (28.1% compared to 21.4%, a difference of 31.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (16.8% compared to 16.4%, a difference of 2.8%), disability age under 5 (1.3% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 3.5%), and disability age 18 to 34 (7.1% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 3.7%).
Arapaho vs Luxembourger Disability
Disability MetricArapahoLuxembourger
Disability
Tragic
13.2%
Exceptional
11.3%
Males
Tragic
13.3%
Good
11.1%
Females
Tragic
13.0%
Exceptional
11.6%
Age | Under 5 years
Fair
1.3%
Tragic
1.3%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Exceptional
4.7%
Exceptional
5.3%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Tragic
7.1%
Tragic
6.9%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Tragic
15.1%
Exceptional
10.6%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
28.1%
Exceptional
21.4%
Age | Over 75 years
Tragic
49.8%
Exceptional
44.8%
Vision
Tragic
2.6%
Exceptional
1.9%
Hearing
Tragic
4.1%
Tragic
3.2%
Cognitive
Exceptional
16.8%
Exceptional
16.4%
Ambulatory
Tragic
7.1%
Exceptional
5.6%
Self-Care
Tragic
2.6%
Exceptional
2.2%