Arapaho vs Chilean Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 23,357,696 people shows a very strong positive correlation between the proportion of Chileans within Arapaho communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.868. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Arapaho within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.185% in Chileans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Arapaho corresponds to an increase of 184.9 Chileans.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Arapaho and Chilean communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($32,345 compared to $46,459, a difference of 43.6%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($75,945 compared to $106,611, a difference of 40.4%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($71,697 compared to $99,900, a difference of 39.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income over 65 years ($59,383 compared to $63,957, a difference of 7.7%), wage/income gap (23.5% compared to 26.3%, a difference of 12.0%), and householder income under 25 years ($44,003 compared to $53,185, a difference of 20.9%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Arapaho and Chilean communities in the United States are seen in single male poverty (21.9% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 84.1%), single father poverty (24.0% compared to 15.7%, a difference of 52.7%), and family poverty (12.7% compared to 8.5%, a difference of 49.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.7% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 0.50%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.6% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 4.2%), and single mother poverty (33.4% compared to 27.9%, a difference of 19.9%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Arapaho and Chilean communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (19.0% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 164.8%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (12.8% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 146.9%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (15.4% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 137.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.3% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 3.6%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.1% compared to 8.4%, a difference of 4.6%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.8% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 10.0%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Arapaho and Chilean communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 25-29 (76.6% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 11.0%), in labor force | age 35-44 (78.1% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 8.5%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (77.1% compared to 83.4%, a difference of 8.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (73.8% compared to 74.5%, a difference of 0.99%), in labor force | age 16-19 (37.3% compared to 35.8%, a difference of 4.2%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (81.5% compared to 84.9%, a difference of 4.3%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Arapaho and Chilean communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (47.1% compared to 30.7%, a difference of 53.6%), single father households (2.9% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 31.0%), and divorced or separated (14.8% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 23.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (66.5% compared to 65.2%, a difference of 2.0%), family households with children (25.6% compared to 28.1%, a difference of 10.0%), and average family size (3.64 compared to 3.23, a difference of 12.6%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Arapaho and Chilean communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (9.4% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 46.2%), no vehicles in household (7.4% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 34.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (26.4% compared to 19.7%, a difference of 34.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.7% compared to 90.2%, a difference of 2.8%), 2 or more vehicles in household (60.2% compared to 56.1%, a difference of 7.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (26.4% compared to 19.7%, a difference of 34.3%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Arapaho and Chilean communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.2% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 84.5%), professional degree (2.9% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 82.9%), and master's degree (10.0% compared to 16.9%, a difference of 69.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 10th grade (94.2% compared to 93.9%, a difference of 0.31%), 11th grade (92.4% compared to 92.9%, a difference of 0.54%), and 4th grade (98.1% compared to 97.5%, a difference of 0.61%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Arapaho and Chilean communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (15.1% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 47.1%), hearing disability (4.1% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 44.7%), and disability age 65 to 74 (28.1% compared to 22.0%, a difference of 27.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age under 5 (1.3% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 0.70%), cognitive disability (16.8% compared to 17.0%, a difference of 1.0%), and disability age over 75 (49.8% compared to 46.5%, a difference of 7.2%).