Arapaho vs Jordanian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 19,764,209 people shows a perfect positive correlation between the proportion of Jordanians within Arapaho communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 1.000. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Arapaho within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.055% in Jordanians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Arapaho corresponds to an increase of 54.7 Jordanians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Arapaho and Jordanian communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($75,945 compared to $109,376, a difference of 44.0%), per capita income ($32,345 compared to $45,605, a difference of 41.0%), and median male earnings ($41,758 compared to $58,500, a difference of 40.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income over 65 years ($59,383 compared to $64,313, a difference of 8.3%), wage/income gap (23.5% compared to 26.8%, a difference of 14.2%), and householder income under 25 years ($44,003 compared to $51,796, a difference of 17.7%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Arapaho and Jordanian communities in the United States are seen in single male poverty (21.9% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 78.8%), family poverty (12.7% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 55.2%), and single father poverty (24.0% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 48.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.7% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 9.3%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.6% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 15.4%), and single mother poverty (33.4% compared to 26.4%, a difference of 26.6%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Arapaho and Jordanian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (19.0% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 159.1%), unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (15.4% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 149.9%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (12.8% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 149.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.3% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 8.4%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.1% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 13.1%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.8% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 15.3%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Arapaho and Jordanian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 25-29 (76.6% compared to 84.2%, a difference of 10.0%), in labor force | age 45-54 (77.1% compared to 83.4%, a difference of 8.1%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (78.1% compared to 84.4%, a difference of 8.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (73.8% compared to 75.5%, a difference of 2.4%), in labor force | age 16-19 (37.3% compared to 36.4%, a difference of 2.4%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (81.5% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 4.3%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Arapaho and Jordanian communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (47.1% compared to 28.5%, a difference of 65.2%), single father households (2.9% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 32.5%), and divorced or separated (14.8% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 29.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (66.5% compared to 65.5%, a difference of 1.4%), average family size (3.64 compared to 3.24, a difference of 12.1%), and family households with children (25.6% compared to 29.0%, a difference of 13.3%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Arapaho and Jordanian communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (9.4% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 42.4%), 3 or more vehicles in household (26.4% compared to 20.1%, a difference of 31.4%), and no vehicles in household (7.4% compared to 8.5%, a difference of 16.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.7% compared to 91.4%, a difference of 1.4%), 2 or more vehicles in household (60.2% compared to 57.6%, a difference of 4.7%), and no vehicles in household (7.4% compared to 8.5%, a difference of 16.0%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Arapaho and Jordanian communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.2% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 71.8%), master's degree (10.0% compared to 16.5%, a difference of 65.2%), and professional degree (2.9% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 64.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 10th grade (94.2% compared to 94.4%, a difference of 0.18%), 9th grade (95.7% compared to 95.3%, a difference of 0.40%), and 7th grade (96.8% compared to 96.4%, a difference of 0.47%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Arapaho and Jordanian communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (15.1% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 48.5%), hearing disability (4.1% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 45.9%), and vision disability (2.6% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 30.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (16.8% compared to 16.8%, a difference of 0.32%), disability age over 75 (49.8% compared to 46.1%, a difference of 8.2%), and disability age 5 to 17 (4.7% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 9.7%).