Arapaho vs Burmese Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 28,875,223 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Burmese within Arapaho communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.298. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Arapaho within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.047% in Burmese. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Arapaho corresponds to a decrease of 47.2 Burmese.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Arapaho and Burmese communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($32,345 compared to $52,005, a difference of 60.8%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($75,945 compared to $121,444, a difference of 59.9%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($71,697 compared to $113,701, a difference of 58.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (23.5% compared to 28.0%, a difference of 19.4%), householder income over 65 years ($59,383 compared to $71,139, a difference of 19.8%), and householder income under 25 years ($44,003 compared to $54,800, a difference of 24.5%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Arapaho and Burmese communities in the United States are seen in single male poverty (21.9% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 87.1%), child poverty under the age of 5 (23.1% compared to 13.2%, a difference of 74.8%), and family poverty (12.7% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 72.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.7% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 8.8%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.6% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 15.5%), and single mother poverty (33.4% compared to 26.2%, a difference of 27.4%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Arapaho and Burmese communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (19.0% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 193.7%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (12.8% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 149.1%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (15.4% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 148.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.1% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 1.5%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.3% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 5.0%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.8% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 11.8%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Arapaho and Burmese communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 25-29 (76.6% compared to 85.1%, a difference of 11.2%), in labor force | age 35-44 (78.1% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 8.5%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (77.1% compared to 83.6%, a difference of 8.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (73.8% compared to 73.6%, a difference of 0.29%), in labor force | age 30-34 (81.5% compared to 85.3%, a difference of 4.6%), and in labor force | age > 16 (62.1% compared to 66.2%, a difference of 6.5%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Arapaho and Burmese communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (47.1% compared to 26.4%, a difference of 78.7%), single father households (2.9% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 42.7%), and divorced or separated (14.8% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 38.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (66.5% compared to 65.7%, a difference of 1.1%), family households with children (25.6% compared to 28.5%, a difference of 11.5%), and average family size (3.64 compared to 3.22, a difference of 13.0%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Arapaho and Burmese communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (9.4% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 37.0%), no vehicles in household (7.4% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 31.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (26.4% compared to 20.6%, a difference of 28.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.7% compared to 90.4%, a difference of 2.5%), 2 or more vehicles in household (60.2% compared to 57.8%, a difference of 4.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (26.4% compared to 20.6%, a difference of 28.1%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Arapaho and Burmese communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.2% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 125.9%), professional degree (2.9% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 113.7%), and master's degree (10.0% compared to 19.7%, a difference of 97.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 10th grade (94.2% compared to 94.5%, a difference of 0.28%), 9th grade (95.7% compared to 95.4%, a difference of 0.31%), and 4th grade (98.1% compared to 97.7%, a difference of 0.47%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Arapaho and Burmese communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (15.1% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 63.5%), hearing disability (4.1% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 48.2%), and vision disability (2.6% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 41.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 5 to 17 (4.7% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 0.89%), cognitive disability (16.8% compared to 16.7%, a difference of 1.0%), and disability age over 75 (49.8% compared to 45.9%, a difference of 8.5%).