Arapaho vs Immigrants from Nepal Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 20,602,201 people shows a perfect positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Nepal within Arapaho communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.992. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Arapaho within a typical geography, there is an increase of 1.491% in Immigrants from Nepal. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Arapaho corresponds to an increase of 1,490.9 Immigrants from Nepal.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Arapaho and Immigrants from Nepal communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($32,345 compared to $44,187, a difference of 36.6%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($75,945 compared to $102,190, a difference of 34.6%), and median male earnings ($41,758 compared to $55,615, a difference of 33.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income over 65 years ($59,383 compared to $61,843, a difference of 4.1%), wage/income gap (23.5% compared to 24.9%, a difference of 6.0%), and householder income under 25 years ($44,003 compared to $52,611, a difference of 19.6%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Arapaho and Immigrants from Nepal communities in the United States are seen in single male poverty (21.9% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 84.8%), single father poverty (24.0% compared to 14.8%, a difference of 62.1%), and family poverty (12.7% compared to 8.5%, a difference of 48.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.7% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 8.0%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.6% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 15.5%), and single mother poverty (33.4% compared to 27.9%, a difference of 19.7%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Arapaho and Immigrants from Nepal communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (19.0% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 180.5%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (12.8% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 174.5%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (15.4% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 167.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.1% compared to 8.3%, a difference of 3.5%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.3% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 12.3%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.8% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 18.7%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Arapaho and Immigrants from Nepal communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 25-29 (76.6% compared to 85.8%, a difference of 12.0%), in labor force | age > 16 (62.1% compared to 68.0%, a difference of 9.5%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (78.1% compared to 85.3%, a difference of 9.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 16-19 (37.3% compared to 38.3%, a difference of 2.8%), in labor force | age 20-24 (73.8% compared to 76.0%, a difference of 3.0%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (81.5% compared to 85.6%, a difference of 5.1%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Arapaho and Immigrants from Nepal communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (47.1% compared to 29.6%, a difference of 59.3%), single father households (2.9% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 30.0%), and divorced or separated (14.8% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 28.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (66.5% compared to 62.7%, a difference of 6.0%), married-couple households (41.8% compared to 45.2%, a difference of 8.1%), and single mother households (7.1% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 10.9%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Arapaho and Immigrants from Nepal communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (9.4% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 67.9%), 3 or more vehicles in household (26.4% compared to 17.6%, a difference of 50.0%), and no vehicles in household (7.4% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 43.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.7% compared to 89.5%, a difference of 3.5%), 2 or more vehicles in household (60.2% compared to 53.5%, a difference of 12.5%), and no vehicles in household (7.4% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 43.0%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Arapaho and Immigrants from Nepal communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.2% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 86.6%), master's degree (10.0% compared to 17.0%, a difference of 69.6%), and professional degree (2.9% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 66.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 11th grade (92.4% compared to 92.4%, a difference of 0.010%), 10th grade (94.2% compared to 93.7%, a difference of 0.51%), and 12th grade, no diploma (90.5% compared to 91.2%, a difference of 0.77%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Arapaho and Immigrants from Nepal communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (4.1% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 53.1%), disability age 35 to 64 (15.1% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 42.7%), and vision disability (2.6% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 35.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (49.8% compared to 46.6%, a difference of 6.9%), cognitive disability (16.8% compared to 18.0%, a difference of 7.2%), and disability age 18 to 34 (7.1% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 13.1%).