Arapaho vs British Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 29,432,735 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of British within Arapaho communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.142. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Arapaho within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.022% in British. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Arapaho corresponds to a decrease of 22.3 British.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Arapaho and British communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($32,345 compared to $46,571, a difference of 44.0%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($75,945 compared to $106,264, a difference of 39.9%), and median male earnings ($41,758 compared to $57,890, a difference of 38.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income over 65 years ($59,383 compared to $63,940, a difference of 7.7%), householder income under 25 years ($44,003 compared to $51,477, a difference of 17.0%), and wage/income gap (23.5% compared to 28.9%, a difference of 23.1%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Arapaho and British communities in the United States are seen in single male poverty (21.9% compared to 13.3%, a difference of 64.5%), family poverty (12.7% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 59.7%), and married-couple family poverty (6.6% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 52.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother poverty (33.4% compared to 29.2%, a difference of 14.7%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.7% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 18.2%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (25.2% compared to 20.7%, a difference of 21.8%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Arapaho and British communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (19.0% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 151.8%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (12.8% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 143.7%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (15.4% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 139.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.3% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 6.2%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.8% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 12.3%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.1% compared to 9.6%, a difference of 18.8%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Arapaho and British communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 25-29 (76.6% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 10.6%), in labor force | age 16-19 (37.3% compared to 40.5%, a difference of 8.6%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (78.1% compared to 84.2%, a difference of 7.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (81.5% compared to 84.5%, a difference of 3.7%), in labor force | age 20-24 (73.8% compared to 76.7%, a difference of 4.0%), and in labor force | age > 16 (62.1% compared to 64.7%, a difference of 4.1%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Arapaho and British communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (47.1% compared to 30.8%, a difference of 52.9%), single father households (2.9% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 30.2%), and single mother households (7.1% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 23.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (66.5% compared to 64.4%, a difference of 3.2%), family households with children (25.6% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 7.4%), and average family size (3.64 compared to 3.13, a difference of 16.0%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Arapaho and British communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (9.4% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 29.9%), 3 or more vehicles in household (26.4% compared to 21.9%, a difference of 20.7%), and no vehicles in household (7.4% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 3.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.7% compared to 92.5%, a difference of 0.20%), 2 or more vehicles in household (60.2% compared to 60.0%, a difference of 0.35%), and no vehicles in household (7.4% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 3.3%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Arapaho and British communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.2% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 85.8%), professional degree (2.9% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 75.1%), and master's degree (10.0% compared to 16.4%, a difference of 64.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 3rd grade (98.4% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.010%), 2nd grade (98.5% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.060%), and nursery school (98.6% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.070%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Arapaho and British communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (15.1% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 29.5%), disability age 5 to 17 (4.7% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 24.1%), and disability age 65 to 74 (28.1% compared to 23.0%, a difference of 22.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (16.8% compared to 17.0%, a difference of 1.1%), disability age 18 to 34 (7.1% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 3.0%), and female disability (13.0% compared to 12.4%, a difference of 5.1%).