Arapaho vs South American Indian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 20,821,465 people shows a near-perfect positive correlation between the proportion of South American Indians within Arapaho communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.933. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Arapaho within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.205% in South American Indians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Arapaho corresponds to an increase of 205.3 South American Indians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Arapaho and South American Indian communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($32,345 compared to $44,206, a difference of 36.7%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($71,697 compared to $96,497, a difference of 34.6%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($75,945 compared to $101,171, a difference of 33.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income over 65 years ($59,383 compared to $62,215, a difference of 4.8%), wage/income gap (23.5% compared to 24.7%, a difference of 5.4%), and householder income under 25 years ($44,003 compared to $52,979, a difference of 20.4%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Arapaho and South American Indian communities in the United States are seen in single male poverty (21.9% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 81.0%), single father poverty (24.0% compared to 15.7%, a difference of 52.6%), and family poverty (12.7% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 38.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.7% compared to 12.9%, a difference of 1.5%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.6% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 1.9%), and single mother poverty (33.4% compared to 29.3%, a difference of 14.3%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Arapaho and South American Indian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (19.0% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 139.9%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (12.8% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 130.2%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (15.4% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 126.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.3% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 0.77%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.1% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 1.8%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.8% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 5.4%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Arapaho and South American Indian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 25-29 (76.6% compared to 84.5%, a difference of 10.3%), in labor force | age 35-44 (78.1% compared to 84.5%, a difference of 8.3%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (77.1% compared to 82.9%, a difference of 7.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (73.8% compared to 75.3%, a difference of 2.0%), in labor force | age 30-34 (81.5% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 3.9%), and in labor force | age 16-19 (37.3% compared to 35.8%, a difference of 4.2%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Arapaho and South American Indian communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (47.1% compared to 31.7%, a difference of 48.4%), single father households (2.9% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 29.0%), and divorced or separated (14.8% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 25.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (66.5% compared to 64.6%, a difference of 2.9%), family households with children (25.6% compared to 28.0%, a difference of 9.4%), and married-couple households (41.8% compared to 46.0%, a difference of 10.1%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Arapaho and South American Indian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (7.4% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 64.1%), 4 or more vehicles in household (9.4% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 49.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (26.4% compared to 19.1%, a difference of 38.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.7% compared to 88.0%, a difference of 5.3%), 2 or more vehicles in household (60.2% compared to 53.9%, a difference of 11.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (26.4% compared to 19.1%, a difference of 38.5%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Arapaho and South American Indian communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.2% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 69.3%), professional degree (2.9% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 65.4%), and master's degree (10.0% compared to 15.9%, a difference of 59.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 12th grade, no diploma (90.5% compared to 90.6%, a difference of 0.12%), high school diploma (88.6% compared to 88.5%, a difference of 0.12%), and 11th grade (92.4% compared to 92.0%, a difference of 0.46%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Arapaho and South American Indian communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (4.1% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 45.0%), disability age 35 to 64 (15.1% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 38.1%), and male disability (13.3% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 22.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (16.8% compared to 17.5%, a difference of 4.0%), disability age under 5 (1.3% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 4.9%), and disability age over 75 (49.8% compared to 47.1%, a difference of 5.7%).