Arapaho vs Asian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 29,598,093 people shows a moderate negative correlation between the proportion of Asians within Arapaho communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.499. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Arapaho within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.345% in Asians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Arapaho corresponds to a decrease of 345.2 Asians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Arapaho and Asian communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($71,697 compared to $112,666, a difference of 57.1%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($75,945 compared to $118,426, a difference of 55.9%), and per capita income ($32,345 compared to $50,057, a difference of 54.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (23.5% compared to 26.9%, a difference of 14.8%), householder income over 65 years ($59,383 compared to $68,822, a difference of 15.9%), and householder income under 25 years ($44,003 compared to $57,003, a difference of 29.5%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Arapaho and Asian communities in the United States are seen in single male poverty (21.9% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 95.8%), child poverty under the age of 5 (23.1% compared to 14.0%, a difference of 65.6%), and single father poverty (24.0% compared to 14.6%, a difference of 64.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.7% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 5.8%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.6% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 11.9%), and single mother poverty (33.4% compared to 26.0%, a difference of 28.8%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Arapaho and Asian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (19.0% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 185.1%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (12.8% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 150.2%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (15.4% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 143.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.1% compared to 8.3%, a difference of 2.4%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.3% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 3.8%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.8% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 10.9%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Arapaho and Asian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 25-29 (76.6% compared to 84.8%, a difference of 10.8%), in labor force | age 16-19 (37.3% compared to 34.1%, a difference of 9.4%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (78.1% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 8.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (73.8% compared to 73.7%, a difference of 0.18%), in labor force | age 30-34 (81.5% compared to 85.1%, a difference of 4.4%), and in labor force | age > 16 (62.1% compared to 66.2%, a difference of 6.5%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Arapaho and Asian communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (47.1% compared to 26.8%, a difference of 75.9%), divorced or separated (14.8% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 39.3%), and single father households (2.9% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 38.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (66.5% compared to 66.5%, a difference of 0.050%), average family size (3.64 compared to 3.28, a difference of 10.9%), and family households with children (25.6% compared to 29.1%, a difference of 13.6%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Arapaho and Asian communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (9.4% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 33.4%), 3 or more vehicles in household (26.4% compared to 20.8%, a difference of 27.4%), and no vehicles in household (7.4% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 22.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.7% compared to 91.1%, a difference of 1.8%), 2 or more vehicles in household (60.2% compared to 57.0%, a difference of 5.7%), and no vehicles in household (7.4% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 22.1%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Arapaho and Asian communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.2% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 108.2%), professional degree (2.9% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 91.6%), and master's degree (10.0% compared to 18.4%, a difference of 84.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 11th grade (92.4% compared to 92.5%, a difference of 0.15%), 10th grade (94.2% compared to 93.5%, a difference of 0.78%), and high school diploma (88.6% compared to 89.4%, a difference of 0.96%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Arapaho and Asian communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (15.1% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 60.5%), hearing disability (4.1% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 51.6%), and vision disability (2.6% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 37.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (16.8% compared to 16.7%, a difference of 0.53%), disability age 5 to 17 (4.7% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 1.5%), and disability age over 75 (49.8% compared to 46.9%, a difference of 6.1%).