Arapaho vs Cajun Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 20,723,773 people shows a moderate negative correlation between the proportion of Cajuns within Arapaho communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.410. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Arapaho within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.009% in Cajuns. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Arapaho corresponds to a decrease of 9.2 Cajuns.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Arapaho and Cajun communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (23.5% compared to 33.9%, a difference of 44.4%), median male earnings ($41,758 compared to $52,325, a difference of 25.3%), and per capita income ($32,345 compared to $37,527, a difference of 16.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($44,003 compared to $45,338, a difference of 3.0%), median household income ($67,965 compared to $70,605, a difference of 3.9%), and median family income ($82,064 compared to $87,157, a difference of 6.2%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Arapaho and Cajun communities in the United States are seen in single mother poverty (33.4% compared to 40.3%, a difference of 20.7%), married-couple family poverty (6.6% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 17.0%), and single female poverty (26.4% compared to 30.6%, a difference of 15.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty (17.5% compared to 17.5%, a difference of 0.15%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.6% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 2.1%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (25.2% compared to 25.7%, a difference of 2.1%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Arapaho and Cajun communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (19.0% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 107.4%), unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (10.3% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 93.0%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (12.8% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 92.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.3% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 0.25%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.8% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 5.2%), and unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (6.1% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 13.8%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Arapaho and Cajun communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 25-29 (76.6% compared to 82.5%, a difference of 7.8%), in labor force | age 35-44 (78.1% compared to 81.5%, a difference of 4.4%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (73.8% compared to 75.1%, a difference of 1.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (81.5% compared to 82.0%, a difference of 0.58%), in labor force | age > 16 (62.1% compared to 61.8%, a difference of 0.60%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (77.1% compared to 78.1%, a difference of 1.3%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Arapaho and Cajun communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.9% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 18.2%), currently married (40.5% compared to 47.1%, a difference of 16.2%), and births to unmarried women (47.1% compared to 41.0%, a difference of 15.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (66.5% compared to 64.8%, a difference of 2.7%), single mother households (7.1% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 3.2%), and family households with children (25.6% compared to 27.7%, a difference of 8.5%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Arapaho and Cajun communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (9.4% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 56.9%), 3 or more vehicles in household (26.4% compared to 19.3%, a difference of 37.1%), and no vehicles in household (7.4% compared to 8.4%, a difference of 14.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.7% compared to 91.7%, a difference of 1.1%), 2 or more vehicles in household (60.2% compared to 57.7%, a difference of 4.5%), and no vehicles in household (7.4% compared to 8.4%, a difference of 14.7%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Arapaho and Cajun communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.2% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 24.3%), no schooling completed (2.1% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 22.4%), and professional degree (2.9% compared to 3.4%, a difference of 17.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 7th grade (96.8% compared to 96.8%, a difference of 0.010%), 4th grade (98.1% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.090%), and 5th grade (98.0% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.12%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Arapaho and Cajun communities in the United States are seen in disability age 5 to 17 (4.7% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 51.7%), disability age under 5 (1.3% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 26.3%), and vision disability (2.6% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 17.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 65 to 74 (28.1% compared to 27.9%, a difference of 0.58%), disability age over 75 (49.8% compared to 50.7%, a difference of 1.7%), and disability age 35 to 64 (15.1% compared to 15.3%, a difference of 1.8%).