Arapaho vs Immigrants from Southern Europe Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 26,630,190 people shows a substantial negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Southern Europe within Arapaho communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.525. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Arapaho within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.041% in Immigrants from Southern Europe. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Arapaho corresponds to a decrease of 40.7 Immigrants from Southern Europe.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Arapaho and Immigrants from Southern Europe communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($32,345 compared to $48,027, a difference of 48.5%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($71,697 compared to $103,486, a difference of 44.3%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($75,945 compared to $107,775, a difference of 41.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income over 65 years ($59,383 compared to $61,902, a difference of 4.2%), wage/income gap (23.5% compared to 26.4%, a difference of 12.6%), and householder income under 25 years ($44,003 compared to $54,484, a difference of 23.8%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Arapaho and Immigrants from Southern Europe communities in the United States are seen in single male poverty (21.9% compared to 12.4%, a difference of 77.0%), family poverty (12.7% compared to 8.5%, a difference of 49.4%), and single father poverty (24.0% compared to 16.7%, a difference of 43.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.7% compared to 12.7%, a difference of 0.060%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.6% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 4.5%), and single mother poverty (33.4% compared to 28.4%, a difference of 17.6%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Arapaho and Immigrants from Southern Europe communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (19.0% compared to 7.5%, a difference of 153.2%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (12.8% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 130.5%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (15.4% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 127.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.3% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 3.1%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.8% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 3.7%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.1% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 13.6%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Arapaho and Immigrants from Southern Europe communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 25-29 (76.6% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 11.1%), in labor force | age 35-44 (78.1% compared to 84.8%, a difference of 8.6%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (77.1% compared to 82.9%, a difference of 7.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (73.8% compared to 74.5%, a difference of 1.0%), in labor force | age 16-19 (37.3% compared to 36.4%, a difference of 2.2%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (81.5% compared to 85.1%, a difference of 4.4%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Arapaho and Immigrants from Southern Europe communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (47.1% compared to 31.1%, a difference of 51.6%), single father households (2.9% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 34.6%), and divorced or separated (14.8% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 28.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (66.5% compared to 64.4%, a difference of 3.3%), family households with children (25.6% compared to 26.9%, a difference of 5.4%), and married-couple households (41.8% compared to 46.8%, a difference of 11.9%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Arapaho and Immigrants from Southern Europe communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (7.4% compared to 13.0%, a difference of 77.1%), 4 or more vehicles in household (9.4% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 63.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (26.4% compared to 17.9%, a difference of 47.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.7% compared to 87.1%, a difference of 6.5%), 2 or more vehicles in household (60.2% compared to 52.3%, a difference of 15.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (26.4% compared to 17.9%, a difference of 47.5%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Arapaho and Immigrants from Southern Europe communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (2.9% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 75.1%), doctorate degree (1.2% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 74.3%), and master's degree (10.0% compared to 16.6%, a difference of 66.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of high school diploma (88.6% compared to 88.7%, a difference of 0.18%), 11th grade (92.4% compared to 92.1%, a difference of 0.33%), and 12th grade, no diploma (90.5% compared to 90.8%, a difference of 0.34%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Arapaho and Immigrants from Southern Europe communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (15.1% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 40.3%), hearing disability (4.1% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 36.6%), and disability age 65 to 74 (28.1% compared to 22.1%, a difference of 27.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (16.8% compared to 16.7%, a difference of 0.58%), self-care disability (2.6% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 5.1%), and female disability (13.0% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 7.2%).