Arapaho vs Immigrants from Lithuania Community Comparison

COMPARE

Arapaho
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Immigrants from Lithuania
Race
Ancestry
AfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAmericanApacheArabArgentineanArmenianAustralianAustrianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCanadianCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ik
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfricaArgentinaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSerbiaSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayVenezuelaVietnamWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern Europe
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Arapaho

Immigrants from Lithuania

Fair
Exceptional
2,537
SOCIAL INDEX
22.9/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
252nd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
9,656
SOCIAL INDEX
94.0/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
10th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Immigrants from Lithuania Integration in Arapaho Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 17,708,862 people shows a perfect positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Lithuania within Arapaho communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 1.000. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Arapaho within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.063% in Immigrants from Lithuania. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Arapaho corresponds to an increase of 62.9 Immigrants from Lithuania.
Arapaho Integration in Immigrants from Lithuania Communities

Arapaho vs Immigrants from Lithuania Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Arapaho and Immigrants from Lithuania communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($32,345 compared to $51,361, a difference of 58.8%), median male earnings ($41,758 compared to $63,346, a difference of 51.7%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($71,697 compared to $108,149, a difference of 50.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income over 65 years ($59,383 compared to $66,087, a difference of 11.3%), wage/income gap (23.5% compared to 28.6%, a difference of 21.9%), and householder income under 25 years ($44,003 compared to $55,028, a difference of 25.1%).
Arapaho vs Immigrants from Lithuania Income
Income MetricArapahoImmigrants from Lithuania
Per Capita Income
Tragic
$32,345
Exceptional
$51,361
Median Family Income
Tragic
$82,064
Exceptional
$118,053
Median Household Income
Tragic
$67,965
Exceptional
$96,836
Median Earnings
Tragic
$36,586
Exceptional
$52,769
Median Male Earnings
Tragic
$41,758
Exceptional
$63,346
Median Female Earnings
Tragic
$31,489
Exceptional
$43,317
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Tragic
$44,003
Exceptional
$55,028
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Tragic
$71,697
Exceptional
$108,149
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Tragic
$75,945
Exceptional
$114,336
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Poor
$59,383
Exceptional
$66,087
Wage/Income Gap
Exceptional
23.5%
Tragic
28.6%

Arapaho vs Immigrants from Lithuania Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Arapaho and Immigrants from Lithuania communities in the United States are seen in single male poverty (21.9% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 89.0%), family poverty (12.7% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 75.2%), and child poverty among girls under 16 (21.7% compared to 13.1%, a difference of 65.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.7% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 15.7%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.6% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 20.3%), and single mother poverty (33.4% compared to 25.2%, a difference of 32.6%).
Arapaho vs Immigrants from Lithuania Poverty
Poverty MetricArapahoImmigrants from Lithuania
Poverty
Tragic
16.3%
Exceptional
10.3%
Families
Tragic
12.7%
Exceptional
7.2%
Males
Tragic
15.1%
Exceptional
9.4%
Females
Tragic
17.5%
Exceptional
11.3%
Females 18 to 24 years
Tragic
25.2%
Exceptional
17.4%
Females 25 to 34 years
Tragic
17.8%
Exceptional
11.1%
Children Under 5 years
Tragic
23.1%
Exceptional
14.1%
Children Under 16 years
Tragic
20.8%
Exceptional
12.9%
Boys Under 16 years
Tragic
20.2%
Exceptional
13.5%
Girls Under 16 years
Tragic
21.7%
Exceptional
13.1%
Single Males
Tragic
21.9%
Exceptional
11.6%
Single Females
Tragic
26.4%
Exceptional
17.8%
Single Fathers
Tragic
24.0%
Exceptional
15.3%
Single Mothers
Tragic
33.4%
Exceptional
25.2%
Married Couples
Tragic
6.6%
Exceptional
4.3%
Seniors Over 65 years
Tragic
11.6%
Exceptional
9.7%
Seniors Over 75 years
Poor
12.7%
Exceptional
11.0%
Receiving Food Stamps
Tragic
14.1%
Exceptional
9.2%

Arapaho vs Immigrants from Lithuania Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Arapaho and Immigrants from Lithuania communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (19.0% compared to 7.5%, a difference of 152.2%), unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (15.4% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 148.7%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (12.8% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 147.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.3% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 4.6%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.1% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 8.1%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.8% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 11.7%).
Arapaho vs Immigrants from Lithuania Unemployment
Unemployment MetricArapahoImmigrants from Lithuania
Unemployment
Tragic
9.8%
Exceptional
5.0%
Males
Tragic
11.0%
Excellent
5.1%
Females
Tragic
8.8%
Exceptional
4.9%
Youth < 25
Tragic
16.3%
Exceptional
11.3%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Tragic
25.2%
Exceptional
17.0%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Tragic
13.8%
Excellent
10.1%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Tragic
15.4%
Exceptional
6.2%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Tragic
12.8%
Exceptional
5.2%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Tragic
10.3%
Exceptional
4.4%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Tragic
7.5%
Fair
4.6%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Tragic
6.1%
Good
4.8%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Tragic
6.3%
Excellent
4.8%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
5.8%
Exceptional
5.2%
Seniors > 65
Tragic
5.3%
Exceptional
5.0%
Seniors > 75
Exceptional
8.1%
Average
8.7%
Women w/ Children < 6
Tragic
19.0%
Good
7.5%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Tragic
16.8%
Exceptional
8.6%
Women w/ Children < 18
Tragic
9.2%
Exceptional
5.2%

Arapaho vs Immigrants from Lithuania Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Arapaho and Immigrants from Lithuania communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 25-29 (76.6% compared to 86.1%, a difference of 12.5%), in labor force | age 35-44 (78.1% compared to 85.4%, a difference of 9.3%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (77.1% compared to 83.9%, a difference of 8.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 16-19 (37.3% compared to 37.2%, a difference of 0.090%), in labor force | age 20-24 (73.8% compared to 76.1%, a difference of 3.2%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (81.5% compared to 85.6%, a difference of 5.1%).
Arapaho vs Immigrants from Lithuania Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricArapahoImmigrants from Lithuania
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Tragic
62.1%
Exceptional
65.6%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Tragic
74.4%
Exceptional
80.7%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Excellent
37.3%
Excellent
37.2%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Tragic
73.8%
Exceptional
76.1%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Tragic
76.6%
Exceptional
86.1%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Tragic
81.5%
Exceptional
85.6%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Tragic
78.1%
Exceptional
85.4%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Tragic
77.1%
Exceptional
83.9%

Arapaho vs Immigrants from Lithuania Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Arapaho and Immigrants from Lithuania communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (47.1% compared to 27.7%, a difference of 69.8%), single father households (2.9% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 53.9%), and single mother households (7.1% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 35.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (66.5% compared to 63.9%, a difference of 4.1%), family households with children (25.6% compared to 26.8%, a difference of 4.8%), and average family size (3.64 compared to 3.15, a difference of 15.3%).
Arapaho vs Immigrants from Lithuania Family Structure
Family Structure MetricArapahoImmigrants from Lithuania
Family Households
Exceptional
66.5%
Poor
63.9%
Family Households with Children
Tragic
25.6%
Tragic
26.8%
Married-couple Households
Tragic
41.8%
Exceptional
48.6%
Average Family Size
Exceptional
3.64
Tragic
3.15
Single Father Households
Tragic
2.9%
Exceptional
1.9%
Single Mother Households
Tragic
7.1%
Exceptional
5.3%
Currently Married
Tragic
40.5%
Exceptional
48.8%
Divorced or Separated
Tragic
14.8%
Exceptional
11.3%
Births to Unmarried Women
Tragic
47.1%
Exceptional
27.7%

Arapaho vs Immigrants from Lithuania Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Arapaho and Immigrants from Lithuania communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (9.4% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 65.8%), 3 or more vehicles in household (26.4% compared to 18.5%, a difference of 43.3%), and no vehicles in household (7.4% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 33.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.7% compared to 90.2%, a difference of 2.7%), 2 or more vehicles in household (60.2% compared to 55.8%, a difference of 7.9%), and no vehicles in household (7.4% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 33.6%).
Arapaho vs Immigrants from Lithuania Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricArapahoImmigrants from Lithuania
No Vehicles Available
Exceptional
7.4%
Excellent
9.8%
1+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
92.7%
Excellent
90.2%
2+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
60.2%
Good
55.8%
3+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
26.4%
Tragic
18.5%
4+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
9.4%
Tragic
5.6%

Arapaho vs Immigrants from Lithuania Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Arapaho and Immigrants from Lithuania communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (2.9% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 93.9%), doctorate degree (1.2% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 89.3%), and master's degree (10.0% compared to 18.5%, a difference of 85.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 7th grade (96.8% compared to 96.8%, a difference of 0.020%), 8th grade (96.6% compared to 96.6%, a difference of 0.050%), and 9th grade (95.7% compared to 95.8%, a difference of 0.11%).
Arapaho vs Immigrants from Lithuania Education Level
Education Level MetricArapahoImmigrants from Lithuania
No Schooling Completed
Average
2.1%
Exceptional
1.7%
Nursery School
Exceptional
98.6%
Exceptional
98.3%
Kindergarten
Exceptional
98.6%
Exceptional
98.3%
1st Grade
Exceptional
98.6%
Exceptional
98.3%
2nd Grade
Exceptional
98.5%
Exceptional
98.2%
3rd Grade
Exceptional
98.4%
Exceptional
98.2%
4th Grade
Exceptional
98.1%
Exceptional
98.0%
5th Grade
Exceptional
98.0%
Exceptional
97.8%
6th Grade
Exceptional
97.8%
Exceptional
97.6%
7th Grade
Exceptional
96.8%
Exceptional
96.8%
8th Grade
Exceptional
96.6%
Exceptional
96.6%
9th Grade
Exceptional
95.7%
Exceptional
95.8%
10th Grade
Exceptional
94.2%
Exceptional
95.0%
11th Grade
Fair
92.4%
Exceptional
94.1%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Tragic
90.5%
Exceptional
93.1%
High School Diploma
Poor
88.6%
Exceptional
91.3%
GED/Equivalency
Tragic
82.8%
Exceptional
88.6%
College, Under 1 year
Tragic
60.3%
Exceptional
70.3%
College, 1 year or more
Tragic
54.1%
Exceptional
64.6%
Associate's Degree
Tragic
36.7%
Exceptional
52.4%
Bachelor's Degree
Tragic
26.6%
Exceptional
44.6%
Master's Degree
Tragic
10.0%
Exceptional
18.5%
Professional Degree
Tragic
2.9%
Exceptional
5.6%
Doctorate Degree
Tragic
1.2%
Exceptional
2.2%

Arapaho vs Immigrants from Lithuania Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Arapaho and Immigrants from Lithuania communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (15.1% compared to 9.6%, a difference of 57.1%), hearing disability (4.1% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 41.8%), and disability age 65 to 74 (28.1% compared to 20.5%, a difference of 36.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age under 5 (1.3% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 0.35%), cognitive disability (16.8% compared to 16.0%, a difference of 5.5%), and disability age 5 to 17 (4.7% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 7.9%).
Arapaho vs Immigrants from Lithuania Disability
Disability MetricArapahoImmigrants from Lithuania
Disability
Tragic
13.2%
Exceptional
10.9%
Males
Tragic
13.3%
Exceptional
10.5%
Females
Tragic
13.0%
Exceptional
11.2%
Age | Under 5 years
Fair
1.3%
Fair
1.3%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Exceptional
4.7%
Exceptional
5.1%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Tragic
7.1%
Exceptional
5.8%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Tragic
15.1%
Exceptional
9.6%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
28.1%
Exceptional
20.5%
Age | Over 75 years
Tragic
49.8%
Exceptional
44.9%
Vision
Tragic
2.6%
Exceptional
1.9%
Hearing
Tragic
4.1%
Good
2.9%
Cognitive
Exceptional
16.8%
Exceptional
16.0%
Ambulatory
Tragic
7.1%
Exceptional
5.6%
Self-Care
Tragic
2.6%
Exceptional
2.3%