Arapaho vs Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 21,545,768 people shows a near-perfect positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar within Arapaho communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.913. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Arapaho within a typical geography, there is an increase of 1.957% in Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Arapaho corresponds to an increase of 1,957.1 Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Arapaho and Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($32,345 compared to $39,827, a difference of 23.1%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($71,697 compared to $86,736, a difference of 21.0%), and median female earnings ($31,489 compared to $38,028, a difference of 20.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (23.5% compared to 22.8%, a difference of 2.7%), householder income over 65 years ($59,383 compared to $57,114, a difference of 4.0%), and householder income under 25 years ($44,003 compared to $48,749, a difference of 10.8%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Arapaho and Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar communities in the United States are seen in single male poverty (21.9% compared to 13.1%, a difference of 67.1%), single father poverty (24.0% compared to 16.5%, a difference of 45.6%), and family poverty (12.7% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 20.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.6% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 3.4%), child poverty among boys under 16 (20.2% compared to 19.2%, a difference of 5.1%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.7% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 5.3%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Arapaho and Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (19.0% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 159.4%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (12.8% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 152.1%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (15.4% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 147.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.1% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 4.4%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.3% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 13.5%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.8% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 21.0%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Arapaho and Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 25-29 (76.6% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 10.6%), in labor force | age 35-44 (78.1% compared to 84.0%, a difference of 7.6%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (74.4% compared to 79.7%, a difference of 7.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (73.8% compared to 76.3%, a difference of 3.5%), in labor force | age 30-34 (81.5% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 3.9%), and in labor force | age 16-19 (37.3% compared to 39.0%, a difference of 4.8%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Arapaho and Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (47.1% compared to 32.9%, a difference of 43.3%), divorced or separated (14.8% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 22.0%), and single father households (2.9% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 19.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother households (7.1% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 0.88%), married-couple households (41.8% compared to 43.4%, a difference of 3.8%), and family households (66.5% compared to 62.6%, a difference of 6.2%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Arapaho and Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (9.4% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 49.8%), no vehicles in household (7.4% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 41.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (26.4% compared to 18.8%, a difference of 40.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.7% compared to 89.7%, a difference of 3.4%), 2 or more vehicles in household (60.2% compared to 53.9%, a difference of 11.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (26.4% compared to 18.8%, a difference of 40.6%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Arapaho and Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.1% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 49.4%), doctorate degree (1.2% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 46.9%), and professional degree (2.9% compared to 3.9%, a difference of 37.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of ged/equivalency (82.8% compared to 83.0%, a difference of 0.30%), 12th grade, no diploma (90.5% compared to 88.9%, a difference of 1.8%), and nursery school (98.6% compared to 96.9%, a difference of 1.8%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Arapaho and Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (4.1% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 41.2%), disability age 35 to 64 (15.1% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 22.7%), and vision disability (2.6% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 19.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (49.8% compared to 47.9%, a difference of 4.1%), disability age 18 to 34 (7.1% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 4.2%), and female disability (13.0% compared to 12.4%, a difference of 5.1%).