Choctaw vs Immigrants from Nicaragua Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 154,203,520 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Nicaragua within Choctaw communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.116. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Choctaw within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.020% in Immigrants from Nicaragua. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Choctaw corresponds to a decrease of 19.8 Immigrants from Nicaragua.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Choctaw and Immigrants from Nicaragua communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (28.1% compared to 23.0%, a difference of 22.4%), householder income under 25 years ($45,450 compared to $53,266, a difference of 17.2%), and median household income ($69,947 compared to $76,784, a difference of 9.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median male earnings ($47,729 compared to $47,482, a difference of 0.52%), householder income over 65 years ($53,060 compared to $52,085, a difference of 1.9%), and median earnings ($40,270 compared to $41,737, a difference of 3.6%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Choctaw and Immigrants from Nicaragua communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.5% compared to 17.6%, a difference of 40.4%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.4% compared to 15.9%, a difference of 39.9%), and single male poverty (17.0% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 35.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family poverty (11.6% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 4.6%), female poverty (16.8% compared to 15.8%, a difference of 6.6%), and poverty (15.6% compared to 14.3%, a difference of 8.8%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Choctaw and Immigrants from Nicaragua communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (9.8% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 36.1%), unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (5.3% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 17.7%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (6.4% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 15.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female unemployment (5.4% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 0.30%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.1% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 0.50%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.9% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 1.2%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Choctaw and Immigrants from Nicaragua communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.0% compared to 31.6%, a difference of 20.1%), in labor force | age > 16 (61.5% compared to 65.1%, a difference of 5.9%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (78.2% compared to 82.7%, a difference of 5.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (74.7% compared to 72.9%, a difference of 2.4%), in labor force | age 25-29 (81.0% compared to 82.9%, a difference of 2.4%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (81.4% compared to 83.9%, a difference of 3.1%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Choctaw and Immigrants from Nicaragua communities in the United States are seen in divorced or separated (14.1% compared to 13.3%, a difference of 6.1%), currently married (46.3% compared to 43.7%, a difference of 5.7%), and single mother households (7.0% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 5.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (28.1% compared to 28.2%, a difference of 0.34%), single father households (2.7% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 2.1%), and births to unmarried women (36.9% compared to 38.0%, a difference of 3.0%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Choctaw and Immigrants from Nicaragua communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (7.9% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 25.8%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.8% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 14.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (23.0% compared to 20.2%, a difference of 13.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.2% compared to 90.1%, a difference of 2.4%), 2 or more vehicles in household (59.3% compared to 55.4%, a difference of 7.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (23.0% compared to 20.2%, a difference of 13.8%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Choctaw and Immigrants from Nicaragua communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.8% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 69.6%), professional degree (3.2% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 15.5%), and bachelor's degree (29.4% compared to 31.9%, a difference of 8.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of college, 1 year or more (52.3% compared to 52.4%, a difference of 0.040%), nursery school (98.3% compared to 96.9%, a difference of 1.4%), and kindergarten (98.3% compared to 96.9%, a difference of 1.4%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Choctaw and Immigrants from Nicaragua communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (4.5% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 70.1%), disability age 35 to 64 (16.4% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 62.9%), and disability age under 5 (1.9% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 62.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (52.7% compared to 48.2%, a difference of 9.2%), cognitive disability (18.4% compared to 16.8%, a difference of 9.7%), and self-care disability (3.0% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 13.8%).