Immigrants from Malaysia vs Immigrants from Nicaragua Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 134,714,825 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Nicaragua within Immigrant from Malaysia communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.091. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Malaysia within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.018% in Immigrants from Nicaragua. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Malaysia corresponds to a decrease of 18.4 Immigrants from Nicaragua.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Malaysia and Immigrants from Nicaragua communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($49,983 compared to $38,065, a difference of 31.3%), median family income ($115,880 compared to $88,267, a difference of 31.3%), and median male earnings ($62,121 compared to $47,482, a difference of 30.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($54,179 compared to $53,266, a difference of 1.7%), wage/income gap (26.3% compared to 23.0%, a difference of 14.4%), and median female earnings ($43,835 compared to $36,023, a difference of 21.7%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Malaysia and Immigrants from Nicaragua communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (10.4% compared to 17.2%, a difference of 66.2%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.0% compared to 15.9%, a difference of 45.2%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.3% compared to 17.6%, a difference of 42.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single male poverty (12.0% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 4.4%), single father poverty (15.2% compared to 16.2%, a difference of 6.3%), and single mother poverty (27.3% compared to 30.3%, a difference of 11.2%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Malaysia and Immigrants from Nicaragua communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.2% compared to 9.6%, a difference of 17.3%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.0% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 13.5%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.4% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 12.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.9% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 0.56%), unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.3% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 0.75%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (7.9% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 0.94%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Malaysia and Immigrants from Nicaragua communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (34.3% compared to 31.6%, a difference of 8.4%), in labor force | age 25-29 (85.0% compared to 82.9%, a difference of 2.5%), and in labor force | age > 16 (66.1% compared to 65.1%, a difference of 1.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (73.3% compared to 72.9%, a difference of 0.55%), in labor force | age 45-54 (83.2% compared to 82.7%, a difference of 0.57%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (84.6% compared to 84.1%, a difference of 0.68%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Malaysia and Immigrants from Nicaragua communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (27.4% compared to 38.0%, a difference of 38.8%), single mother households (5.7% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 31.3%), and single father households (2.0% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 30.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (27.9% compared to 28.2%, a difference of 0.83%), average family size (3.22 compared to 3.37, a difference of 4.6%), and family households (64.0% compared to 67.5%, a difference of 5.4%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Malaysia and Immigrants from Nicaragua communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (13.6% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 37.0%), 4 or more vehicles in household (5.9% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 15.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.3% compared to 20.2%, a difference of 10.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (86.5% compared to 90.1%, a difference of 4.2%), 2 or more vehicles in household (52.7% compared to 55.4%, a difference of 5.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.3% compared to 20.2%, a difference of 10.5%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Malaysia and Immigrants from Nicaragua communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (2.6% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 88.6%), master's degree (18.9% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 59.7%), and professional degree (5.7% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 53.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.7% compared to 96.9%, a difference of 0.77%), kindergarten (97.7% compared to 96.9%, a difference of 0.79%), and 1st grade (97.6% compared to 96.9%, a difference of 0.80%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Malaysia and Immigrants from Nicaragua communities in the United States are seen in vision disability (1.9% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 21.4%), self-care disability (2.3% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 15.9%), and disability age 65 to 74 (21.4% compared to 24.1%, a difference of 12.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.1% compared to 16.8%, a difference of 1.8%), hearing disability (2.7% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 2.4%), and disability age 35 to 64 (9.7% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 3.3%).