Crow vs Immigrants from Nicaragua Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 44,586,846 people shows a perfect positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Nicaragua within Crow communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.998. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Crow within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.247% in Immigrants from Nicaragua. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Crow corresponds to an increase of 246.9 Immigrants from Nicaragua.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Crow and Immigrants from Nicaragua communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (19.1% compared to 23.0%, a difference of 20.6%), median household income ($63,681 compared to $76,784, a difference of 20.6%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($74,257 compared to $89,108, a difference of 20.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($35,266 compared to $36,023, a difference of 2.1%), householder income over 65 years ($49,234 compared to $52,085, a difference of 5.8%), and median earnings ($38,707 compared to $41,737, a difference of 7.8%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Crow and Immigrants from Nicaragua communities in the United States are seen in single father poverty (30.3% compared to 16.2%, a difference of 87.4%), single male poverty (23.3% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 86.0%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (33.2% compared to 17.9%, a difference of 85.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 65 (15.2% compared to 15.9%, a difference of 4.5%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (15.9% compared to 17.6%, a difference of 10.3%), and single mother poverty (38.6% compared to 30.3%, a difference of 27.4%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Crow and Immigrants from Nicaragua communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (15.7% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 248.4%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (16.9% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 242.5%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (17.4% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 239.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.0% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 1.2%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.2% compared to 9.6%, a difference of 3.8%), and unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (5.9% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 22.7%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Crow and Immigrants from Nicaragua communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.5% compared to 31.6%, a difference of 21.7%), in labor force | age 30-34 (75.9% compared to 83.9%, a difference of 10.5%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (76.5% compared to 84.1%, a difference of 9.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (76.9% compared to 72.9%, a difference of 5.4%), in labor force | age 25-29 (78.6% compared to 82.9%, a difference of 5.5%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (78.3% compared to 82.7%, a difference of 5.6%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Crow and Immigrants from Nicaragua communities in the United States are seen in single father households (3.5% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 32.2%), average family size (3.82 compared to 3.37, a difference of 13.5%), and currently married (40.4% compared to 43.7%, a difference of 8.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother households (7.4% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 0.25%), family households with children (27.4% compared to 28.2%, a difference of 2.9%), and family households (65.3% compared to 67.5%, a difference of 3.3%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Crow and Immigrants from Nicaragua communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (7.8% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 14.7%), no vehicles in household (11.0% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 11.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.5% compared to 20.2%, a difference of 11.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2 or more vehicles in household (55.7% compared to 55.4%, a difference of 0.64%), 1 or more vehicles in household (89.3% compared to 90.1%, a difference of 0.91%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.5% compared to 20.2%, a difference of 11.2%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Crow and Immigrants from Nicaragua communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.6% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 87.5%), professional degree (3.2% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 18.1%), and bachelor's degree (27.7% compared to 31.9%, a difference of 15.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (99.7% compared to 96.9%, a difference of 2.8%), kindergarten (99.7% compared to 96.9%, a difference of 2.8%), and 1st grade (99.6% compared to 96.9%, a difference of 2.9%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Crow and Immigrants from Nicaragua communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (4.2% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 55.7%), disability age 18 to 34 (8.3% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 45.8%), and disability age 35 to 64 (14.6% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 45.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (49.6% compared to 48.2%, a difference of 2.8%), disability age 5 to 17 (5.4% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 3.0%), and cognitive disability (17.3% compared to 16.8%, a difference of 3.1%).