Celtic vs Immigrants from Nicaragua Community Comparison

COMPARE

Celtic
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Immigrants from Nicaragua
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Celtics

Immigrants from Nicaragua

Average
Fair
5,342
SOCIAL INDEX
50.9/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
179th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
3,407
SOCIAL INDEX
31.6/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
221st/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Immigrants from Nicaragua Integration in Celtic Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 108,109,417 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Nicaragua within Celtic communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.273. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Celtics within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.035% in Immigrants from Nicaragua. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Celtics corresponds to a decrease of 35.0 Immigrants from Nicaragua.
Celtic Integration in Immigrants from Nicaragua Communities

Celtic vs Immigrants from Nicaragua Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Celtic and Immigrants from Nicaragua communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (27.3% compared to 23.0%, a difference of 18.6%), householder income over 65 years ($60,608 compared to $52,085, a difference of 16.4%), and per capita income ($43,621 compared to $38,065, a difference of 14.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($50,447 compared to $53,266, a difference of 5.6%), median female earnings ($38,283 compared to $36,023, a difference of 6.3%), and median household income ($83,193 compared to $76,784, a difference of 8.4%).
Celtic vs Immigrants from Nicaragua Income
Income MetricCelticImmigrants from Nicaragua
Per Capita Income
Average
$43,621
Tragic
$38,065
Median Family Income
Fair
$101,139
Tragic
$88,267
Median Household Income
Fair
$83,193
Tragic
$76,784
Median Earnings
Fair
$45,732
Tragic
$41,737
Median Male Earnings
Average
$54,242
Tragic
$47,482
Median Female Earnings
Tragic
$38,283
Tragic
$36,023
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Tragic
$50,447
Exceptional
$53,266
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Fair
$92,241
Tragic
$84,914
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Fair
$98,896
Tragic
$89,108
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Average
$60,608
Tragic
$52,085
Wage/Income Gap
Tragic
27.3%
Exceptional
23.0%

Celtic vs Immigrants from Nicaragua Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Celtic and Immigrants from Nicaragua communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 65 (9.8% compared to 15.9%, a difference of 61.9%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.0% compared to 17.6%, a difference of 59.6%), and receiving food stamps (10.9% compared to 17.2%, a difference of 57.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 25-34 year olds (14.5% compared to 14.8%, a difference of 1.8%), single mother poverty (30.9% compared to 30.3%, a difference of 2.0%), and single female poverty (22.7% compared to 21.6%, a difference of 5.1%).
Celtic vs Immigrants from Nicaragua Poverty
Poverty MetricCelticImmigrants from Nicaragua
Poverty
Average
12.3%
Tragic
14.3%
Families
Good
8.8%
Tragic
11.1%
Males
Average
11.2%
Tragic
12.9%
Females
Average
13.4%
Tragic
15.8%
Females 18 to 24 years
Tragic
21.6%
Exceptional
17.9%
Females 25 to 34 years
Tragic
14.5%
Tragic
14.8%
Children Under 5 years
Poor
17.9%
Tragic
19.8%
Children Under 16 years
Fair
16.4%
Tragic
18.8%
Boys Under 16 years
Average
16.6%
Tragic
19.0%
Girls Under 16 years
Fair
17.0%
Tragic
18.8%
Single Males
Tragic
14.5%
Excellent
12.5%
Single Females
Tragic
22.7%
Poor
21.6%
Single Fathers
Tragic
18.5%
Good
16.2%
Single Mothers
Tragic
30.9%
Tragic
30.3%
Married Couples
Exceptional
4.8%
Tragic
7.1%
Seniors Over 65 years
Exceptional
9.8%
Tragic
15.9%
Seniors Over 75 years
Exceptional
11.0%
Tragic
17.6%
Receiving Food Stamps
Excellent
10.9%
Tragic
17.2%

Celtic vs Immigrants from Nicaragua Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Celtic and Immigrants from Nicaragua communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.3% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 17.4%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.3% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 15.4%), and female unemployment (4.9% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 10.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.6% compared to 17.6%, a difference of 0.31%), unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.4% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 0.62%), and unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.3% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 0.68%).
Celtic vs Immigrants from Nicaragua Unemployment
Unemployment MetricCelticImmigrants from Nicaragua
Unemployment
Exceptional
4.9%
Average
5.2%
Males
Exceptional
5.0%
Exceptional
5.1%
Females
Exceptional
4.9%
Poor
5.4%
Youth < 25
Exceptional
11.3%
Exceptional
11.2%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Average
17.6%
Average
17.6%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Exceptional
9.9%
Exceptional
9.7%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Tragic
6.9%
Excellent
6.4%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Good
5.4%
Fair
5.5%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Good
4.7%
Excellent
4.5%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Excellent
4.4%
Exceptional
4.4%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Exceptional
4.7%
Good
4.8%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Tragic
5.1%
Fair
4.9%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Excellent
5.3%
Exceptional
5.1%
Seniors > 65
Exceptional
5.0%
Exceptional
4.9%
Seniors > 75
Tragic
9.3%
Exceptional
7.9%
Women w/ Children < 6
Tragic
8.3%
Exceptional
7.2%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Tragic
9.5%
Tragic
9.6%
Women w/ Children < 18
Good
5.4%
Tragic
5.7%

Celtic vs Immigrants from Nicaragua Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Celtic and Immigrants from Nicaragua communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (41.3% compared to 31.6%, a difference of 30.6%), in labor force | age 20-24 (77.1% compared to 72.9%, a difference of 5.7%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (84.7% compared to 82.9%, a difference of 2.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (84.1% compared to 83.9%, a difference of 0.16%), in labor force | age 35-44 (83.8% compared to 84.1%, a difference of 0.33%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (78.7% compared to 79.3%, a difference of 0.79%).
Celtic vs Immigrants from Nicaragua Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricCelticImmigrants from Nicaragua
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Tragic
63.8%
Average
65.1%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Tragic
78.7%
Poor
79.3%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Exceptional
41.3%
Tragic
31.6%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Exceptional
77.1%
Tragic
72.9%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Average
84.7%
Tragic
82.9%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Tragic
84.1%
Tragic
83.9%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Tragic
83.8%
Tragic
84.1%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Tragic
81.8%
Average
82.7%

Celtic vs Immigrants from Nicaragua Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Celtic and Immigrants from Nicaragua communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (6.1% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 21.1%), single father households (2.3% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 14.1%), and births to unmarried women (33.3% compared to 38.0%, a difference of 14.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of divorced or separated (13.0% compared to 13.3%, a difference of 2.8%), family households with children (26.6% compared to 28.2%, a difference of 5.8%), and family households (63.8% compared to 67.5%, a difference of 5.8%).
Celtic vs Immigrants from Nicaragua Family Structure
Family Structure MetricCelticImmigrants from Nicaragua
Family Households
Tragic
63.8%
Exceptional
67.5%
Family Households with Children
Tragic
26.6%
Exceptional
28.2%
Married-couple Households
Excellent
47.3%
Tragic
44.5%
Average Family Size
Tragic
3.11
Exceptional
3.37
Single Father Households
Average
2.3%
Tragic
2.7%
Single Mother Households
Good
6.1%
Tragic
7.4%
Currently Married
Exceptional
47.8%
Tragic
43.7%
Divorced or Separated
Tragic
13.0%
Tragic
13.3%
Births to Unmarried Women
Poor
33.3%
Tragic
38.0%

Celtic vs Immigrants from Nicaragua Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Celtic and Immigrants from Nicaragua communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (8.1% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 22.9%), 3 or more vehicles in household (21.7% compared to 20.2%, a difference of 7.2%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (59.2% compared to 55.4%, a difference of 6.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.1% compared to 90.1%, a difference of 2.2%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.1% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 4.4%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (59.2% compared to 55.4%, a difference of 6.8%).
Celtic vs Immigrants from Nicaragua Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricCelticImmigrants from Nicaragua
No Vehicles Available
Exceptional
8.1%
Good
9.9%
1+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
92.1%
Good
90.1%
2+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
59.2%
Average
55.4%
3+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
21.7%
Excellent
20.2%
4+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
7.1%
Exceptional
6.8%

Celtic vs Immigrants from Nicaragua Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Celtic and Immigrants from Nicaragua communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.6% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 88.3%), doctorate degree (1.9% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 38.8%), and master's degree (14.8% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 24.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.5% compared to 96.9%, a difference of 1.5%), kindergarten (98.4% compared to 96.9%, a difference of 1.6%), and 1st grade (98.4% compared to 96.9%, a difference of 1.6%).
Celtic vs Immigrants from Nicaragua Education Level
Education Level MetricCelticImmigrants from Nicaragua
No Schooling Completed
Exceptional
1.6%
Tragic
3.1%
Nursery School
Exceptional
98.5%
Tragic
96.9%
Kindergarten
Exceptional
98.4%
Tragic
96.9%
1st Grade
Exceptional
98.4%
Tragic
96.9%
2nd Grade
Exceptional
98.4%
Tragic
96.7%
3rd Grade
Exceptional
98.3%
Tragic
96.5%
4th Grade
Exceptional
98.1%
Tragic
96.0%
5th Grade
Exceptional
98.0%
Tragic
95.6%
6th Grade
Exceptional
97.8%
Tragic
95.1%
7th Grade
Exceptional
97.1%
Tragic
93.0%
8th Grade
Exceptional
96.8%
Tragic
92.5%
9th Grade
Exceptional
96.0%
Tragic
91.3%
10th Grade
Exceptional
95.0%
Tragic
89.5%
11th Grade
Exceptional
93.7%
Tragic
88.1%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Exceptional
92.3%
Tragic
86.6%
High School Diploma
Exceptional
90.6%
Tragic
83.1%
GED/Equivalency
Exceptional
86.7%
Tragic
79.9%
College, Under 1 year
Good
65.9%
Tragic
57.6%
College, 1 year or more
Average
59.4%
Tragic
52.4%
Associate's Degree
Fair
45.8%
Tragic
40.3%
Bachelor's Degree
Fair
37.0%
Tragic
31.9%
Master's Degree
Average
14.8%
Tragic
11.8%
Professional Degree
Average
4.4%
Tragic
3.7%
Doctorate Degree
Good
1.9%
Tragic
1.4%

Celtic vs Immigrants from Nicaragua Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Celtic and Immigrants from Nicaragua communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.7% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 45.5%), hearing disability (3.7% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 39.2%), and disability age 18 to 34 (7.6% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 34.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 65 to 74 (24.2% compared to 24.1%, a difference of 0.65%), cognitive disability (17.1% compared to 16.8%, a difference of 2.0%), and disability age over 75 (47.2% compared to 48.2%, a difference of 2.1%).
Celtic vs Immigrants from Nicaragua Disability
Disability MetricCelticImmigrants from Nicaragua
Disability
Tragic
13.1%
Exceptional
11.3%
Males
Tragic
13.0%
Exceptional
10.6%
Females
Tragic
13.3%
Exceptional
11.9%
Age | Under 5 years
Tragic
1.7%
Exceptional
1.2%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Tragic
6.3%
Exceptional
5.2%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Tragic
7.6%
Exceptional
5.7%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Tragic
12.9%
Exceptional
10.1%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
24.2%
Tragic
24.1%
Age | Over 75 years
Average
47.2%
Tragic
48.2%
Vision
Tragic
2.4%
Tragic
2.3%
Hearing
Tragic
3.7%
Exceptional
2.7%
Cognitive
Good
17.1%
Exceptional
16.8%
Ambulatory
Tragic
6.7%
Average
6.1%
Self-Care
Tragic
2.6%
Tragic
2.7%