Immigrants from Peru vs Immigrants from Nicaragua Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 202,295,232 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Nicaragua within Immigrant from Peru communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.080. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Peru within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.026% in Immigrants from Nicaragua. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Peru corresponds to an increase of 25.6 Immigrants from Nicaragua.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Peru and Immigrants from Nicaragua communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($61,988 compared to $52,085, a difference of 19.0%), median family income ($103,534 compared to $88,267, a difference of 17.3%), and median household income ($89,010 compared to $76,784, a difference of 15.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($56,384 compared to $53,266, a difference of 5.9%), wage/income gap (25.1% compared to 23.0%, a difference of 9.2%), and median female earnings ($39,871 compared to $36,023, a difference of 10.7%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Peru and Immigrants from Nicaragua communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (12.0% compared to 17.2%, a difference of 43.1%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (12.0% compared to 15.9%, a difference of 32.7%), and married-couple family poverty (5.4% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 31.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (15.3% compared to 16.2%, a difference of 5.4%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (16.9% compared to 17.9%, a difference of 6.0%), and single male poverty (11.5% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 8.3%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Peru and Immigrants from Nicaragua communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.9% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 12.0%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.4% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 9.0%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.6% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 8.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.7% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 0.12%), unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.7% compared to 17.6%, a difference of 0.24%), and female unemployment (5.5% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 0.85%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Peru and Immigrants from Nicaragua communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (34.2% compared to 31.6%, a difference of 8.0%), in labor force | age 25-29 (84.7% compared to 82.9%, a difference of 2.1%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (74.5% compared to 72.9%, a difference of 2.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (84.7% compared to 83.9%, a difference of 0.93%), in labor force | age 35-44 (84.9% compared to 84.1%, a difference of 0.98%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (83.5% compared to 82.7%, a difference of 0.98%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Peru and Immigrants from Nicaragua communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (31.8% compared to 38.0%, a difference of 19.3%), single mother households (6.7% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 11.6%), and single father households (2.4% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 10.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (67.2% compared to 67.5%, a difference of 0.32%), average family size (3.31 compared to 3.37, a difference of 1.8%), and family households with children (28.9% compared to 28.2%, a difference of 2.7%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Peru and Immigrants from Nicaragua communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (11.5% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 15.8%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.4% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 6.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.4% compared to 20.2%, a difference of 4.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (88.6% compared to 90.1%, a difference of 1.7%), 2 or more vehicles in household (54.4% compared to 55.4%, a difference of 1.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.4% compared to 20.2%, a difference of 4.3%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Peru and Immigrants from Nicaragua communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.7% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 27.7%), master's degree (14.9% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 25.9%), and no schooling completed (2.5% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 22.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.5% compared to 96.9%, a difference of 0.58%), kindergarten (97.5% compared to 96.9%, a difference of 0.59%), and 1st grade (97.4% compared to 96.9%, a difference of 0.60%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Peru and Immigrants from Nicaragua communities in the United States are seen in vision disability (2.1% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 11.8%), self-care disability (2.4% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 9.8%), and disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 8.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 5 to 17 (5.3% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 0.62%), hearing disability (2.7% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 0.81%), and cognitive disability (16.6% compared to 16.8%, a difference of 1.4%).