Immigrants from Panama vs Immigrants from Nicaragua Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 153,091,487 people shows a perfect positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Nicaragua within Immigrant from Panama communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.980. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Panama within a typical geography, there is an increase of 1.295% in Immigrants from Nicaragua. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Panama corresponds to an increase of 1,294.8 Immigrants from Nicaragua.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Panama and Immigrants from Nicaragua communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($41,853 compared to $38,065, a difference of 10.0%), median male earnings ($51,962 compared to $47,482, a difference of 9.4%), and householder income over 65 years ($56,944 compared to $52,085, a difference of 9.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (23.4% compared to 23.0%, a difference of 1.8%), householder income under 25 years ($51,278 compared to $53,266, a difference of 3.9%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($93,815 compared to $89,108, a difference of 5.3%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Panama and Immigrants from Nicaragua communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 65 (12.4% compared to 15.9%, a difference of 28.1%), receiving food stamps (13.6% compared to 17.2%, a difference of 26.5%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (13.9% compared to 17.6%, a difference of 26.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single female poverty (21.6% compared to 21.6%, a difference of 0.14%), single male poverty (12.6% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 1.0%), and single father poverty (15.9% compared to 16.2%, a difference of 1.8%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Panama and Immigrants from Nicaragua communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.8% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 11.4%), unemployment among youth under 25 years (12.4% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 10.9%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (5.0% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 10.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.8% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 0.080%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.8% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 1.2%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.8% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 1.3%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Panama and Immigrants from Nicaragua communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (34.0% compared to 31.6%, a difference of 7.5%), in labor force | age 25-29 (84.2% compared to 82.9%, a difference of 1.5%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (73.9% compared to 72.9%, a difference of 1.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (65.1% compared to 65.1%, a difference of 0.020%), in labor force | age 35-44 (84.0% compared to 84.1%, a difference of 0.070%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (79.1% compared to 79.3%, a difference of 0.23%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Panama and Immigrants from Nicaragua communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.4% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 13.0%), births to unmarried women (34.2% compared to 38.0%, a difference of 11.1%), and divorced or separated (12.6% compared to 13.3%, a difference of 5.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple households (44.6% compared to 44.5%, a difference of 0.070%), family households with children (27.7% compared to 28.2%, a difference of 1.6%), and currently married (44.9% compared to 43.7%, a difference of 2.6%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Panama and Immigrants from Nicaragua communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (14.6% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 47.6%), 4 or more vehicles in household (5.7% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 19.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (17.7% compared to 20.2%, a difference of 14.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (85.4% compared to 90.1%, a difference of 5.5%), 2 or more vehicles in household (51.1% compared to 55.4%, a difference of 8.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (17.7% compared to 20.2%, a difference of 14.0%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Panama and Immigrants from Nicaragua communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.3% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 36.3%), master's degree (14.3% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 20.4%), and doctorate degree (1.6% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 17.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.8% compared to 96.9%, a difference of 0.85%), kindergarten (97.7% compared to 96.9%, a difference of 0.86%), and 1st grade (97.7% compared to 96.9%, a difference of 0.87%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Panama and Immigrants from Nicaragua communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (11.6% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 15.0%), disability age 18 to 34 (6.5% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 14.1%), and disability age 5 to 17 (5.8% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 10.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 65 to 74 (24.1% compared to 24.1%, a difference of 0.19%), vision disability (2.3% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 0.48%), and disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 0.55%).