Native Hawaiian vs Immigrants from Nicaragua Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 184,740,933 people shows a substantial negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Nicaragua within Native Hawaiian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.575. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Native Hawaiians within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.009% in Immigrants from Nicaragua. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Native Hawaiians corresponds to a decrease of 8.6 Immigrants from Nicaragua.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Native Hawaiian and Immigrants from Nicaragua communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($71,021 compared to $52,085, a difference of 36.4%), median family income ($104,910 compared to $88,267, a difference of 18.9%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($105,149 compared to $89,108, a difference of 18.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($55,158 compared to $53,266, a difference of 3.5%), median female earnings ($38,461 compared to $36,023, a difference of 6.8%), and per capita income ($41,017 compared to $38,065, a difference of 7.8%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Native Hawaiian and Immigrants from Nicaragua communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 75 (10.1% compared to 17.6%, a difference of 74.6%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (9.4% compared to 15.9%, a difference of 69.0%), and married-couple family poverty (4.6% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 53.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (17.9% compared to 17.9%, a difference of 0.12%), single male poverty (12.6% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 0.84%), and single father poverty (15.7% compared to 16.2%, a difference of 2.7%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Native Hawaiian and Immigrants from Nicaragua communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (7.9% compared to 9.6%, a difference of 20.8%), unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (5.4% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 19.0%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.2% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 13.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.4% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 0.19%), unemployment (5.3% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 2.2%), and unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (18.3% compared to 17.6%, a difference of 4.0%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Native Hawaiian and Immigrants from Nicaragua communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (37.4% compared to 31.6%, a difference of 18.2%), in labor force | age 20-24 (77.4% compared to 72.9%, a difference of 6.1%), and in labor force | age > 16 (64.1% compared to 65.1%, a difference of 1.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (82.9% compared to 82.9%, a difference of 0.010%), in labor force | age 35-44 (83.9% compared to 84.1%, a difference of 0.20%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (79.1% compared to 79.3%, a difference of 0.28%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Native Hawaiian and Immigrants from Nicaragua communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (6.1% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 21.4%), divorced or separated (11.7% compared to 13.3%, a difference of 13.9%), and births to unmarried women (34.3% compared to 38.0%, a difference of 10.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (68.4% compared to 67.5%, a difference of 1.4%), average family size (3.43 compared to 3.37, a difference of 1.7%), and family households with children (27.4% compared to 28.2%, a difference of 2.7%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Native Hawaiian and Immigrants from Nicaragua communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (9.4% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 38.3%), no vehicles in household (7.7% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 29.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (24.9% compared to 20.2%, a difference of 23.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.4% compared to 90.1%, a difference of 2.6%), 2 or more vehicles in household (61.4% compared to 55.4%, a difference of 10.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (24.9% compared to 20.2%, a difference of 23.4%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Native Hawaiian and Immigrants from Nicaragua communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.6% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 94.2%), doctorate degree (1.6% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 16.3%), and college, under 1 year (63.9% compared to 57.6%, a difference of 10.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.5% compared to 96.9%, a difference of 1.6%), kindergarten (98.5% compared to 96.9%, a difference of 1.6%), and 1st grade (98.5% compared to 96.9%, a difference of 1.7%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Native Hawaiian and Immigrants from Nicaragua communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (3.7% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 37.9%), male disability (12.5% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 17.4%), and disability age under 5 (1.3% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 17.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 65 to 74 (24.1% compared to 24.1%, a difference of 0.070%), disability age over 75 (48.3% compared to 48.2%, a difference of 0.20%), and disability age 5 to 17 (5.2% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 0.27%).