Czech vs Immigrants from Nicaragua Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 218,327,732 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Nicaragua within Czech communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.383. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Czechs within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.039% in Immigrants from Nicaragua. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Czechs corresponds to an increase of 38.5 Immigrants from Nicaragua.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Czech and Immigrants from Nicaragua communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (29.2% compared to 23.0%, a difference of 26.9%), median family income ($105,839 compared to $88,267, a difference of 19.9%), and median male earnings ($56,546 compared to $47,482, a difference of 19.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($51,421 compared to $53,266, a difference of 3.6%), median female earnings ($38,992 compared to $36,023, a difference of 8.2%), and median household income ($86,164 compared to $76,784, a difference of 12.2%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Czech and Immigrants from Nicaragua communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (9.2% compared to 17.2%, a difference of 87.0%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (9.0% compared to 15.9%, a difference of 76.8%), and married-couple family poverty (4.0% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 76.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single female poverty (21.0% compared to 21.6%, a difference of 2.7%), single mother poverty (28.9% compared to 30.3%, a difference of 5.0%), and single father poverty (17.0% compared to 16.2%, a difference of 5.0%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Czech and Immigrants from Nicaragua communities in the United States are seen in female unemployment (4.4% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 23.7%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.7% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 22.4%), and unemployment (4.3% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 20.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.0% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 3.4%), unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (9.3% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 4.1%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.7% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 4.8%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Czech and Immigrants from Nicaragua communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (43.6% compared to 31.6%, a difference of 38.0%), in labor force | age 20-24 (78.5% compared to 72.9%, a difference of 7.7%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (85.6% compared to 82.9%, a difference of 3.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (65.4% compared to 65.1%, a difference of 0.52%), in labor force | age 45-54 (83.9% compared to 82.7%, a difference of 1.5%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (85.3% compared to 84.1%, a difference of 1.5%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Czech and Immigrants from Nicaragua communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.6% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 31.6%), births to unmarried women (30.5% compared to 38.0%, a difference of 24.4%), and single father households (2.3% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 14.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (27.5% compared to 28.2%, a difference of 2.2%), family households (64.5% compared to 67.5%, a difference of 4.7%), and average family size (3.11 compared to 3.37, a difference of 8.4%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Czech and Immigrants from Nicaragua communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (6.9% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 44.2%), 3 or more vehicles in household (22.5% compared to 20.2%, a difference of 11.4%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (61.5% compared to 55.4%, a difference of 11.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (93.3% compared to 90.1%, a difference of 3.5%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.4% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 8.3%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (61.5% compared to 55.4%, a difference of 11.0%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Czech and Immigrants from Nicaragua communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.5% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 106.0%), doctorate degree (1.9% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 38.9%), and master's degree (14.7% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 24.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.6% compared to 96.9%, a difference of 1.7%), kindergarten (98.6% compared to 96.9%, a difference of 1.7%), and 1st grade (98.5% compared to 96.9%, a difference of 1.7%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Czech and Immigrants from Nicaragua communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.5% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 34.7%), hearing disability (3.5% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 31.6%), and disability age 18 to 34 (7.2% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 27.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female disability (12.1% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 2.2%), ambulatory disability (6.0% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 2.5%), and cognitive disability (16.4% compared to 16.8%, a difference of 2.6%).