Immigrants from Mexico vs Immigrants from Nicaragua Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 233,401,866 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Nicaragua within Immigrant from Mexico communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.079. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Mexico within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.001% in Immigrants from Nicaragua. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Mexico corresponds to an increase of 0.8 Immigrants from Nicaragua.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Mexico and Immigrants from Nicaragua communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($33,931 compared to $38,065, a difference of 12.2%), wage/income gap (25.3% compared to 23.0%, a difference of 10.0%), and median female earnings ($33,236 compared to $36,023, a difference of 8.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income over 65 years ($52,801 compared to $52,085, a difference of 1.4%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($84,910 compared to $89,108, a difference of 4.9%), and median household income ($73,160 compared to $76,784, a difference of 5.0%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Mexico and Immigrants from Nicaragua communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 75 (14.9% compared to 17.6%, a difference of 17.9%), single female poverty (25.3% compared to 21.6%, a difference of 17.1%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (13.6% compared to 15.9%, a difference of 17.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (16.0% compared to 16.2%, a difference of 0.97%), married-couple family poverty (7.6% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 6.8%), and female poverty (17.0% compared to 15.8%, a difference of 7.6%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Mexico and Immigrants from Nicaragua communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (9.1% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 26.0%), unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (5.4% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 19.0%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (7.6% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 18.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.5% compared to 9.6%, a difference of 1.4%), unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (18.9% compared to 17.6%, a difference of 7.1%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.4% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 10.2%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Mexico and Immigrants from Nicaragua communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (35.1% compared to 31.6%, a difference of 11.1%), in labor force | age 45-54 (79.7% compared to 82.7%, a difference of 3.8%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (81.5% compared to 84.1%, a difference of 3.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (82.0% compared to 82.9%, a difference of 1.1%), in labor force | age > 16 (64.3% compared to 65.1%, a difference of 1.2%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (82.0% compared to 83.9%, a difference of 2.4%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Mexico and Immigrants from Nicaragua communities in the United States are seen in single father households (3.0% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 14.3%), family households with children (31.6% compared to 28.2%, a difference of 12.3%), and divorced or separated (12.0% compared to 13.3%, a difference of 10.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of births to unmarried women (37.5% compared to 38.0%, a difference of 1.3%), currently married (44.5% compared to 43.7%, a difference of 1.8%), and family households (69.1% compared to 67.5%, a difference of 2.5%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Mexico and Immigrants from Nicaragua communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (9.0% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 32.6%), no vehicles in household (8.1% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 21.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (24.6% compared to 20.2%, a difference of 21.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.9% compared to 90.1%, a difference of 2.0%), 2 or more vehicles in household (60.2% compared to 55.4%, a difference of 8.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (24.6% compared to 20.2%, a difference of 21.7%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Mexico and Immigrants from Nicaragua communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (2.6% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 41.0%), master's degree (9.3% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 27.2%), and doctorate degree (1.1% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 22.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of kindergarten (96.4% compared to 96.9%, a difference of 0.57%), nursery school (96.4% compared to 96.9%, a difference of 0.58%), and 1st grade (96.3% compared to 96.9%, a difference of 0.58%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Mexico and Immigrants from Nicaragua communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (12.1% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 20.4%), disability age 18 to 34 (6.6% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 16.0%), and hearing disability (3.0% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 13.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of self-care disability (2.7% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 0.30%), ambulatory disability (6.3% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 2.4%), and female disability (12.2% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 2.7%).