Immigrants from Honduras vs Immigrants from Nicaragua Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 196,561,276 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Nicaragua within Immigrant from Honduras communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.501. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Honduras within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.320% in Immigrants from Nicaragua. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Honduras corresponds to an increase of 320.4 Immigrants from Nicaragua.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Honduras and Immigrants from Nicaragua communities in the United States are seen in householder income under 25 years ($48,267 compared to $53,266, a difference of 10.4%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($77,328 compared to $84,914, a difference of 9.8%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($82,697 compared to $89,108, a difference of 7.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income over 65 years ($51,888 compared to $52,085, a difference of 0.38%), wage/income gap (23.5% compared to 23.0%, a difference of 2.2%), and median male earnings ($45,787 compared to $47,482, a difference of 3.7%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Honduras and Immigrants from Nicaragua communities in the United States are seen in female poverty among 18-24 year olds (21.8% compared to 17.9%, a difference of 21.8%), child poverty among girls under 16 (22.8% compared to 18.8%, a difference of 21.0%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (22.7% compared to 18.8%, a difference of 20.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple family poverty (7.3% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 3.6%), single father poverty (17.1% compared to 16.2%, a difference of 6.1%), and receiving food stamps (15.7% compared to 17.2%, a difference of 9.6%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Honduras and Immigrants from Nicaragua communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.4% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 16.8%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (6.5% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 13.6%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (5.1% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 13.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.2% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 3.5%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.1% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 4.0%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (10.1% compared to 9.6%, a difference of 5.3%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Honduras and Immigrants from Nicaragua communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (35.2% compared to 31.6%, a difference of 11.3%), in labor force | age 20-24 (74.9% compared to 72.9%, a difference of 2.6%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (81.4% compared to 82.7%, a difference of 1.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (83.7% compared to 83.9%, a difference of 0.25%), in labor force | age 25-29 (83.3% compared to 82.9%, a difference of 0.45%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (78.7% compared to 79.3%, a difference of 0.75%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Honduras and Immigrants from Nicaragua communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (8.2% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 10.2%), married-couple households (41.6% compared to 44.5%, a difference of 7.0%), and single father households (2.8% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 5.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.36 compared to 3.37, a difference of 0.42%), family households with children (28.5% compared to 28.2%, a difference of 1.2%), and divorced or separated (12.9% compared to 13.3%, a difference of 3.2%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Honduras and Immigrants from Nicaragua communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (11.8% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 18.5%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.1% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 12.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.2% compared to 20.2%, a difference of 10.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (88.3% compared to 90.1%, a difference of 2.1%), 2 or more vehicles in household (51.8% compared to 55.4%, a difference of 6.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.2% compared to 20.2%, a difference of 10.8%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Honduras and Immigrants from Nicaragua communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (3.5% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 8.1%), associate's degree (38.5% compared to 40.3%, a difference of 4.7%), and bachelor's degree (30.9% compared to 31.9%, a difference of 3.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of kindergarten (96.8% compared to 96.9%, a difference of 0.090%), 1st grade (96.8% compared to 96.9%, a difference of 0.090%), and nursery school (96.9% compared to 96.9%, a difference of 0.10%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Honduras and Immigrants from Nicaragua communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (11.8% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 17.3%), disability age 18 to 34 (6.4% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 12.4%), and disability age 5 to 17 (5.9% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 12.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (48.9% compared to 48.2%, a difference of 1.4%), ambulatory disability (6.3% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 3.0%), and female disability (12.3% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 3.5%).