Immigrants from Sri Lanka vs Immigrants from Cuba Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 127,346,108 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Cuba within Immigrant from Sri Lanka communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.099. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Sri Lanka within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.026% in Immigrants from Cuba. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Sri Lanka corresponds to an increase of 25.6 Immigrants from Cuba.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Sri Lanka and Immigrants from Cuba communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($69,426 compared to $44,735, a difference of 55.2%), median family income ($120,263 compared to $78,249, a difference of 53.7%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($119,094 compared to $80,662, a difference of 47.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($54,512 compared to $50,374, a difference of 8.2%), wage/income gap (27.1% compared to 22.4%, a difference of 21.4%), and median female earnings ($44,161 compared to $33,291, a difference of 32.7%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Sri Lanka and Immigrants from Cuba communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (9.5% compared to 20.8%, a difference of 118.7%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.1% compared to 17.9%, a difference of 78.3%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.5% compared to 19.9%, a difference of 73.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (15.9% compared to 16.4%, a difference of 2.7%), single male poverty (11.8% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 3.1%), and single mother poverty (26.3% compared to 30.1%, a difference of 14.2%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Sri Lanka and Immigrants from Cuba communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.5% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 21.1%), unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.8% compared to 4.1%, a difference of 18.2%), and unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.7% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 17.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.9% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 2.8%), unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.1% compared to 16.6%, a difference of 3.1%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.1% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 3.1%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Sri Lanka and Immigrants from Cuba communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (34.9% compared to 30.2%, a difference of 15.3%), in labor force | age > 16 (66.5% compared to 64.1%, a difference of 3.8%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (74.0% compared to 72.0%, a difference of 2.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (85.0% compared to 84.9%, a difference of 0.030%), in labor force | age 45-54 (83.9% compared to 83.7%, a difference of 0.28%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (80.4% compared to 79.7%, a difference of 0.86%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Sri Lanka and Immigrants from Cuba communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (27.2% compared to 41.5%, a difference of 52.6%), divorced or separated (10.8% compared to 15.2%, a difference of 41.0%), and single father households (2.0% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 33.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.22 compared to 3.26, a difference of 1.3%), family households (65.1% compared to 68.2%, a difference of 4.7%), and family households with children (28.4% compared to 26.8%, a difference of 6.1%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Sri Lanka and Immigrants from Cuba communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (11.2% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 28.1%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.1% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 8.3%), and 1 or more vehicles in household (88.9% compared to 91.3%, a difference of 2.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2 or more vehicles in household (55.5% compared to 55.3%, a difference of 0.45%), 3 or more vehicles in household (19.2% compared to 18.8%, a difference of 2.4%), and 1 or more vehicles in household (88.9% compared to 91.3%, a difference of 2.7%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Sri Lanka and Immigrants from Cuba communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (2.8% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 137.5%), master's degree (19.9% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 83.4%), and professional degree (6.2% compared to 3.6%, a difference of 71.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.0% compared to 97.2%, a difference of 0.81%), kindergarten (97.9% compared to 97.1%, a difference of 0.84%), and 1st grade (97.9% compared to 97.1%, a difference of 0.85%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Sri Lanka and Immigrants from Cuba communities in the United States are seen in vision disability (1.9% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 32.1%), self-care disability (2.2% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 26.6%), and ambulatory disability (5.4% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 20.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of hearing disability (2.7% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 1.4%), disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 1.7%), and disability age 35 to 64 (9.5% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 2.3%).