Immigrants from Ireland vs Immigrants from Cuba Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 188,356,630 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Cuba within Immigrant from Ireland communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.019. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Ireland within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.006% in Immigrants from Cuba. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Ireland corresponds to a decrease of 6.1 Immigrants from Cuba.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Ireland and Immigrants from Cuba communities in the United States are seen in median family income ($127,584 compared to $78,249, a difference of 63.0%), per capita income ($56,584 compared to $34,910, a difference of 62.1%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($120,333 compared to $76,701, a difference of 56.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($57,075 compared to $50,374, a difference of 13.3%), wage/income gap (26.9% compared to 22.4%, a difference of 20.3%), and median female earnings ($47,598 compared to $33,291, a difference of 43.0%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Ireland and Immigrants from Cuba communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (9.2% compared to 20.8%, a difference of 126.8%), married-couple family poverty (4.1% compared to 7.5%, a difference of 83.6%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.0% compared to 17.9%, a difference of 78.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single male poverty (12.1% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 0.60%), single father poverty (17.1% compared to 16.4%, a difference of 4.3%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (18.3% compared to 16.4%, a difference of 11.5%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Ireland and Immigrants from Cuba communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (11.1% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 28.0%), unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (5.0% compared to 4.1%, a difference of 21.6%), and unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.7% compared to 3.9%, a difference of 20.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female unemployment (4.9% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 1.1%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.8% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 1.4%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.1% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 3.0%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Ireland and Immigrants from Cuba communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (35.0% compared to 30.2%, a difference of 15.6%), in labor force | age 25-29 (86.0% compared to 83.2%, a difference of 3.4%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (74.3% compared to 72.0%, a difference of 3.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 45-54 (83.9% compared to 83.7%, a difference of 0.28%), in labor force | age 35-44 (85.6% compared to 84.9%, a difference of 0.77%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (80.7% compared to 79.7%, a difference of 1.3%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Ireland and Immigrants from Cuba communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (27.2% compared to 41.5%, a difference of 52.4%), single mother households (5.0% compared to 7.5%, a difference of 50.4%), and single father households (1.8% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 44.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (26.0% compared to 26.8%, a difference of 3.1%), average family size (3.13 compared to 3.26, a difference of 4.2%), and family households (63.2% compared to 68.2%, a difference of 8.0%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Ireland and Immigrants from Cuba communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (13.7% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 57.5%), 3 or more vehicles in household (17.3% compared to 18.8%, a difference of 8.2%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (52.0% compared to 55.3%, a difference of 6.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 4 or more vehicles in household (5.4% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 5.1%), 1 or more vehicles in household (86.4% compared to 91.3%, a difference of 5.7%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (52.0% compared to 55.3%, a difference of 6.3%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Ireland and Immigrants from Cuba communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (2.5% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 115.8%), master's degree (20.4% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 88.2%), and professional degree (6.3% compared to 3.6%, a difference of 75.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.3% compared to 97.2%, a difference of 1.1%), kindergarten (98.2% compared to 97.1%, a difference of 1.1%), and 1st grade (98.2% compared to 97.1%, a difference of 1.1%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Ireland and Immigrants from Cuba communities in the United States are seen in vision disability (2.0% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 26.3%), self-care disability (2.3% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 21.9%), and disability age 65 to 74 (20.3% compared to 23.6%, a difference of 16.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 5 to 17 (5.2% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 0.98%), cognitive disability (16.1% compared to 16.3%, a difference of 1.3%), and disability age 35 to 64 (9.5% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 1.5%).