Immigrants from Colombia vs Immigrants from Cuba Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 280,088,886 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Cuba within Immigrant from Colombia communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.133. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Colombia within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.236% in Immigrants from Cuba. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Colombia corresponds to an increase of 236.3 Immigrants from Cuba.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Colombia and Immigrants from Cuba communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($57,658 compared to $44,735, a difference of 28.9%), median family income ($98,067 compared to $78,249, a difference of 25.3%), and per capita income ($42,971 compared to $34,910, a difference of 23.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($53,714 compared to $50,374, a difference of 6.6%), wage/income gap (24.3% compared to 22.4%, a difference of 8.8%), and median female earnings ($38,913 compared to $33,291, a difference of 16.9%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Colombia and Immigrants from Cuba communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (12.9% compared to 20.8%, a difference of 61.1%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (12.9% compared to 17.9%, a difference of 39.0%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (14.6% compared to 19.9%, a difference of 36.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single male poverty (12.1% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 0.92%), single father poverty (15.8% compared to 16.4%, a difference of 3.3%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (17.3% compared to 16.4%, a difference of 5.6%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Colombia and Immigrants from Cuba communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.7% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 22.3%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.4% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 21.2%), and unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.3% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 18.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.3% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 1.7%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.6% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 6.7%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.4% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 8.2%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Colombia and Immigrants from Cuba communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (33.5% compared to 30.2%, a difference of 10.6%), in labor force | age > 16 (65.9% compared to 64.1%, a difference of 2.9%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (73.4% compared to 72.0%, a difference of 1.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (84.9% compared to 84.9%, a difference of 0.030%), in labor force | age 45-54 (83.4% compared to 83.7%, a difference of 0.30%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (80.2% compared to 79.7%, a difference of 0.62%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Colombia and Immigrants from Cuba communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (32.6% compared to 41.5%, a difference of 27.1%), divorced or separated (12.6% compared to 15.2%, a difference of 21.0%), and single mother households (6.7% compared to 7.5%, a difference of 12.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.27 compared to 3.26, a difference of 0.090%), family households (66.3% compared to 68.2%, a difference of 2.9%), and married-couple households (46.4% compared to 44.2%, a difference of 4.9%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Colombia and Immigrants from Cuba communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (10.5% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 20.5%), 3 or more vehicles in household (17.3% compared to 18.8%, a difference of 8.3%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (52.0% compared to 55.3%, a difference of 6.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (87.6% compared to 91.3%, a difference of 4.2%), 4 or more vehicles in household (5.4% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 5.8%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (52.0% compared to 55.3%, a difference of 6.3%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Colombia and Immigrants from Cuba communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.7% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 41.1%), master's degree (14.9% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 37.1%), and professional degree (4.5% compared to 3.6%, a difference of 24.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.6% compared to 97.2%, a difference of 0.42%), kindergarten (97.6% compared to 97.1%, a difference of 0.45%), and 1st grade (97.5% compared to 97.1%, a difference of 0.45%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Colombia and Immigrants from Cuba communities in the United States are seen in self-care disability (2.4% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 18.1%), vision disability (2.1% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 16.4%), and ambulatory disability (5.8% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 10.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 35 to 64 (9.8% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 0.85%), cognitive disability (16.5% compared to 16.3%, a difference of 0.93%), and hearing disability (2.7% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 1.5%).