Immigrants from Mexico vs Immigrants from Cuba Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 244,759,159 people shows a moderate negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Cuba within Immigrant from Mexico communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.434. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Mexico within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.007% in Immigrants from Cuba. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Mexico corresponds to a decrease of 7.1 Immigrants from Cuba.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Mexico and Immigrants from Cuba communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($52,801 compared to $44,735, a difference of 18.0%), wage/income gap (25.3% compared to 22.4%, a difference of 13.1%), and median family income ($83,639 compared to $78,249, a difference of 6.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($50,422 compared to $50,374, a difference of 0.090%), median female earnings ($33,236 compared to $33,291, a difference of 0.17%), and median earnings ($39,114 compared to $38,426, a difference of 1.8%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Mexico and Immigrants from Cuba communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (15.2% compared to 20.8%, a difference of 37.3%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (14.9% compared to 19.9%, a difference of 33.4%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (13.6% compared to 17.9%, a difference of 32.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple family poverty (7.6% compared to 7.5%, a difference of 1.4%), single father poverty (16.0% compared to 16.4%, a difference of 2.2%), and female poverty (17.0% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 5.0%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Mexico and Immigrants from Cuba communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (9.1% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 35.3%), unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (7.6% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 35.2%), and male unemployment (5.9% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 33.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.5% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 2.9%), unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (18.9% compared to 16.6%, a difference of 14.0%), and unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.7% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 23.8%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Mexico and Immigrants from Cuba communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (35.1% compared to 30.2%, a difference of 16.2%), in labor force | age 45-54 (79.7% compared to 83.7%, a difference of 5.0%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (81.5% compared to 84.9%, a difference of 4.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (64.3% compared to 64.1%, a difference of 0.32%), in labor force | age 25-29 (82.0% compared to 83.2%, a difference of 1.5%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (82.0% compared to 84.2%, a difference of 2.7%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Mexico and Immigrants from Cuba communities in the United States are seen in divorced or separated (12.0% compared to 15.2%, a difference of 26.5%), family households with children (31.6% compared to 26.8%, a difference of 18.0%), and single father households (3.0% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 14.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (69.1% compared to 68.2%, a difference of 1.4%), currently married (44.5% compared to 43.7%, a difference of 2.0%), and married-couple households (46.4% compared to 44.2%, a difference of 5.1%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Mexico and Immigrants from Cuba communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (9.0% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 58.8%), 3 or more vehicles in household (24.6% compared to 18.8%, a difference of 31.2%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (60.2% compared to 55.3%, a difference of 8.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.9% compared to 91.3%, a difference of 0.66%), no vehicles in household (8.1% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 7.0%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (60.2% compared to 55.3%, a difference of 8.9%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Mexico and Immigrants from Cuba communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (2.6% compared to 3.6%, a difference of 36.0%), no schooling completed (3.6% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 29.2%), and associate's degree (33.7% compared to 39.5%, a difference of 17.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of kindergarten (96.4% compared to 97.1%, a difference of 0.81%), nursery school (96.4% compared to 97.2%, a difference of 0.83%), and 1st grade (96.3% compared to 97.1%, a difference of 0.83%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Mexico and Immigrants from Cuba communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (12.1% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 25.3%), disability age 18 to 34 (6.6% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 22.7%), and disability age 65 to 74 (27.1% compared to 23.6%, a difference of 15.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of vision disability (2.5% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 1.2%), female disability (12.2% compared to 12.4%, a difference of 1.3%), and disability (11.9% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 1.9%).