Immigrants from Scotland vs Immigrants from Cuba Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 156,415,118 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Cuba within Immigrant from Scotland communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.179. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Scotland within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.084% in Immigrants from Cuba. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Scotland corresponds to a decrease of 83.6 Immigrants from Cuba.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Scotland and Immigrants from Cuba communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($66,620 compared to $44,735, a difference of 48.9%), median family income ($114,392 compared to $78,249, a difference of 46.2%), and per capita income ($49,893 compared to $34,910, a difference of 42.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($52,638 compared to $50,374, a difference of 4.5%), median female earnings ($41,771 compared to $33,291, a difference of 25.5%), and wage/income gap (28.7% compared to 22.4%, a difference of 28.5%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Scotland and Immigrants from Cuba communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (9.0% compared to 20.8%, a difference of 131.4%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (9.3% compared to 17.9%, a difference of 93.0%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (10.5% compared to 19.9%, a difference of 88.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (16.7% compared to 16.4%, a difference of 2.1%), single male poverty (12.7% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 3.9%), and single mother poverty (27.6% compared to 30.1%, a difference of 8.9%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Scotland and Immigrants from Cuba communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.2% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 24.3%), unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.7% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 18.5%), and unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.2% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 17.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.2% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 0.44%), female unemployment (4.9% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 0.68%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.2% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 1.0%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Scotland and Immigrants from Cuba communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.5% compared to 30.2%, a difference of 27.3%), in labor force | age 20-24 (75.8% compared to 72.0%, a difference of 5.3%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (85.4% compared to 83.2%, a difference of 2.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-64 (79.6% compared to 79.7%, a difference of 0.12%), in labor force | age > 16 (64.2% compared to 64.1%, a difference of 0.27%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (84.7% compared to 84.9%, a difference of 0.34%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Scotland and Immigrants from Cuba communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.5% compared to 7.5%, a difference of 37.1%), births to unmarried women (30.4% compared to 41.5%, a difference of 36.4%), and single father households (2.1% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 28.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (26.8% compared to 26.8%, a difference of 0.070%), average family size (3.12 compared to 3.26, a difference of 4.4%), and family households (64.7% compared to 68.2%, a difference of 5.4%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Scotland and Immigrants from Cuba communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.7% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 17.5%), 3 or more vehicles in household (20.8% compared to 18.8%, a difference of 10.9%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (58.9% compared to 55.3%, a difference of 6.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.8% compared to 91.3%, a difference of 0.48%), no vehicles in household (8.3% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 4.5%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (58.9% compared to 55.3%, a difference of 6.5%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Scotland and Immigrants from Cuba communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (2.2% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 84.2%), no schooling completed (1.6% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 73.1%), and master's degree (17.4% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 60.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.4% compared to 97.2%, a difference of 1.3%), kindergarten (98.4% compared to 97.1%, a difference of 1.3%), and 1st grade (98.4% compared to 97.1%, a difference of 1.3%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Scotland and Immigrants from Cuba communities in the United States are seen in disability age 18 to 34 (6.8% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 27.2%), hearing disability (3.3% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 21.4%), and disability age under 5 (1.4% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 19.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (16.2% compared to 16.3%, a difference of 0.87%), disability (11.8% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 1.6%), and female disability (12.0% compared to 12.4%, a difference of 2.6%).