Immigrants from Taiwan vs Immigrants from Cuba Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 224,796,319 people shows a mild negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Cuba within Immigrant from Taiwan communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.321. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Taiwan within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.017% in Immigrants from Cuba. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Taiwan corresponds to a decrease of 16.7 Immigrants from Cuba.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Taiwan and Immigrants from Cuba communities in the United States are seen in median family income ($136,949 compared to $78,249, a difference of 75.0%), householder income over 65 years ($77,051 compared to $44,735, a difference of 72.2%), and median male earnings ($74,031 compared to $43,461, a difference of 70.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($59,424 compared to $50,374, a difference of 18.0%), wage/income gap (29.5% compared to 22.4%, a difference of 31.8%), and median female earnings ($49,256 compared to $33,291, a difference of 48.0%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Taiwan and Immigrants from Cuba communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (7.3% compared to 20.8%, a difference of 184.8%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (9.7% compared to 17.9%, a difference of 85.7%), and married-couple family poverty (4.1% compared to 7.5%, a difference of 80.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (17.3% compared to 16.4%, a difference of 5.1%), single male poverty (10.3% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 18.6%), and single father poverty (13.7% compared to 16.4%, a difference of 19.5%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Taiwan and Immigrants from Cuba communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (7.3% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 25.4%), unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.2% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 18.1%), and unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.6% compared to 4.1%, a difference of 12.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.0% compared to 4.1%, a difference of 1.6%), female unemployment (5.0% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 2.1%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (4.9% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 2.4%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Taiwan and Immigrants from Cuba communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (31.0% compared to 30.2%, a difference of 2.6%), in labor force | age > 16 (65.5% compared to 64.1%, a difference of 2.3%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (84.7% compared to 83.2%, a difference of 1.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 45-54 (83.5% compared to 83.7%, a difference of 0.26%), in labor force | age 20-64 (80.0% compared to 79.7%, a difference of 0.36%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (84.5% compared to 84.9%, a difference of 0.54%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Taiwan and Immigrants from Cuba communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (23.0% compared to 41.5%, a difference of 80.2%), single mother households (4.7% compared to 7.5%, a difference of 60.8%), and divorced or separated (9.8% compared to 15.2%, a difference of 55.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (68.0% compared to 68.2%, a difference of 0.26%), average family size (3.24 compared to 3.26, a difference of 0.72%), and family households with children (29.0% compared to 26.8%, a difference of 8.4%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Taiwan and Immigrants from Cuba communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (7.5% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 32.8%), 3 or more vehicles in household (22.1% compared to 18.8%, a difference of 18.0%), and no vehicles in household (7.7% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 12.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.3% compared to 91.3%, a difference of 1.1%), 2 or more vehicles in household (59.7% compared to 55.3%, a difference of 8.1%), and no vehicles in household (7.7% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 12.8%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Taiwan and Immigrants from Cuba communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (3.2% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 171.7%), master's degree (22.5% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 106.9%), and professional degree (7.1% compared to 3.6%, a difference of 96.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.9% compared to 97.2%, a difference of 0.75%), kindergarten (97.9% compared to 97.1%, a difference of 0.78%), and 1st grade (97.9% compared to 97.1%, a difference of 0.78%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Taiwan and Immigrants from Cuba communities in the United States are seen in vision disability (1.7% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 46.4%), ambulatory disability (4.9% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 30.9%), and self-care disability (2.2% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 28.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 18 to 34 (5.4% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 0.28%), cognitive disability (15.7% compared to 16.3%, a difference of 4.0%), and hearing disability (2.6% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 4.2%).