Assyrian/Chaldean/Syriac vs Immigrants from Cuba Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 94,161,620 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Cuba within Assyrian/Chaldean/Syriac communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.171. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Assyrians/Chaldeans/Syriacs within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.006% in Immigrants from Cuba. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Assyrians/Chaldeans/Syriacs corresponds to a decrease of 5.6 Immigrants from Cuba.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Assyrian/Chaldean/Syriac and Immigrants from Cuba communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($64,108 compared to $44,735, a difference of 43.3%), median family income ($109,622 compared to $78,249, a difference of 40.1%), and wage/income gap (31.0% compared to 22.4%, a difference of 38.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($39,159 compared to $33,291, a difference of 17.6%), median earnings ($48,304 compared to $38,426, a difference of 25.7%), and per capita income ($45,195 compared to $34,910, a difference of 29.5%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Assyrian/Chaldean/Syriac and Immigrants from Cuba communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (10.6% compared to 20.8%, a difference of 96.4%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (9.6% compared to 17.9%, a difference of 87.2%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (10.7% compared to 19.9%, a difference of 85.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (13.7% compared to 16.4%, a difference of 19.8%), single male poverty (9.8% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 24.9%), and single female poverty (17.0% compared to 21.2%, a difference of 25.1%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Assyrian/Chaldean/Syriac and Immigrants from Cuba communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (11.1% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 48.7%), unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (7.3% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 29.1%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (7.2% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 27.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.1% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 1.5%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.1% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 1.9%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.5% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 3.7%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Assyrian/Chaldean/Syriac and Immigrants from Cuba communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.3% compared to 30.2%, a difference of 26.7%), in labor force | age 20-24 (75.9% compared to 72.0%, a difference of 5.4%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (84.7% compared to 83.2%, a difference of 1.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (64.0% compared to 64.1%, a difference of 0.060%), in labor force | age 20-64 (79.4% compared to 79.7%, a difference of 0.28%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (83.2% compared to 83.7%, a difference of 0.59%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Assyrian/Chaldean/Syriac and Immigrants from Cuba communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (22.0% compared to 41.5%, a difference of 88.7%), single mother households (4.8% compared to 7.5%, a difference of 56.5%), and divorced or separated (10.6% compared to 15.2%, a difference of 44.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (68.2% compared to 68.2%, a difference of 0.060%), average family size (3.24 compared to 3.26, a difference of 0.60%), and family households with children (28.1% compared to 26.8%, a difference of 4.9%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Assyrian/Chaldean/Syriac and Immigrants from Cuba communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (7.2% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 26.2%), no vehicles in household (7.0% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 24.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.7% compared to 18.8%, a difference of 15.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (93.0% compared to 91.3%, a difference of 1.9%), 2 or more vehicles in household (60.5% compared to 55.3%, a difference of 9.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.7% compared to 18.8%, a difference of 15.9%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Assyrian/Chaldean/Syriac and Immigrants from Cuba communities in the United States are seen in master's degree (15.8% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 45.7%), doctorate degree (1.7% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 40.4%), and bachelor's degree (39.8% compared to 30.3%, a difference of 31.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.6% compared to 97.2%, a difference of 0.38%), kindergarten (97.5% compared to 97.1%, a difference of 0.42%), and 1st grade (97.5% compared to 97.1%, a difference of 0.42%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Assyrian/Chaldean/Syriac and Immigrants from Cuba communities in the United States are seen in vision disability (2.0% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 22.2%), hearing disability (3.3% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 21.0%), and disability age 18 to 34 (6.1% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 13.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of self-care disability (2.8% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 0.24%), disability age 65 to 74 (23.4% compared to 23.6%, a difference of 0.69%), and ambulatory disability (6.4% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 0.70%).