Immigrants from Panama vs Immigrants from Cuba Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 181,120,888 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Cuba within Immigrant from Panama communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.050. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Panama within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.218% in Immigrants from Cuba. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Panama corresponds to a decrease of 218.1 Immigrants from Cuba.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Panama and Immigrants from Cuba communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($56,944 compared to $44,735, a difference of 27.3%), median family income ($95,647 compared to $78,249, a difference of 22.2%), and per capita income ($41,853 compared to $34,910, a difference of 19.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($51,278 compared to $50,374, a difference of 1.8%), wage/income gap (23.4% compared to 22.4%, a difference of 4.7%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($93,815 compared to $80,662, a difference of 16.3%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Panama and Immigrants from Cuba communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (13.6% compared to 20.8%, a difference of 52.7%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (12.4% compared to 17.9%, a difference of 44.5%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (13.9% compared to 19.9%, a difference of 42.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother poverty (29.8% compared to 30.1%, a difference of 1.1%), single female poverty (21.6% compared to 21.2%, a difference of 1.8%), and single father poverty (15.9% compared to 16.4%, a difference of 3.0%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Panama and Immigrants from Cuba communities in the United States are seen in male unemployment (5.6% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 26.7%), unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.8% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 25.0%), and unemployment among youth under 25 years (12.4% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 24.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.1% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 1.2%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.2% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 10.2%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.8% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 10.5%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Panama and Immigrants from Cuba communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (34.0% compared to 30.2%, a difference of 12.4%), in labor force | age 20-24 (73.9% compared to 72.0%, a difference of 2.7%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (82.2% compared to 83.7%, a difference of 1.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (84.3% compared to 84.2%, a difference of 0.14%), in labor force | age 20-64 (79.1% compared to 79.7%, a difference of 0.67%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (84.0% compared to 84.9%, a difference of 1.1%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Panama and Immigrants from Cuba communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (34.2% compared to 41.5%, a difference of 21.2%), divorced or separated (12.6% compared to 15.2%, a difference of 20.8%), and single father households (2.4% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 13.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.27 compared to 3.26, a difference of 0.32%), married-couple households (44.6% compared to 44.2%, a difference of 0.81%), and currently married (44.9% compared to 43.7%, a difference of 2.7%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Panama and Immigrants from Cuba communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (14.6% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 68.2%), 2 or more vehicles in household (51.1% compared to 55.3%, a difference of 8.3%), and 1 or more vehicles in household (85.4% compared to 91.3%, a difference of 6.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 4 or more vehicles in household (5.7% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 0.14%), 3 or more vehicles in household (17.7% compared to 18.8%, a difference of 5.8%), and 1 or more vehicles in household (85.4% compared to 91.3%, a difference of 6.9%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Panama and Immigrants from Cuba communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.6% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 35.1%), master's degree (14.3% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 31.4%), and no schooling completed (2.3% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 25.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.8% compared to 97.2%, a difference of 0.59%), kindergarten (97.7% compared to 97.1%, a difference of 0.61%), and 1st grade (97.7% compared to 97.1%, a difference of 0.62%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Panama and Immigrants from Cuba communities in the United States are seen in disability age 18 to 34 (6.5% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 20.7%), disability age 35 to 64 (11.6% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 19.7%), and disability age 5 to 17 (5.8% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 10.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of ambulatory disability (6.5% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 0.10%), female disability (12.3% compared to 12.4%, a difference of 0.28%), and disability age over 75 (47.9% compared to 47.7%, a difference of 0.47%).