Immigrants from Peru vs Immigrants from Cuba Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 253,744,115 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Cuba within Immigrant from Peru communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.161. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Peru within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.290% in Immigrants from Cuba. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Peru corresponds to a decrease of 290.1 Immigrants from Cuba.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Peru and Immigrants from Cuba communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($61,988 compared to $44,735, a difference of 38.6%), median family income ($103,534 compared to $78,249, a difference of 32.3%), and median household income ($89,010 compared to $68,461, a difference of 30.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($56,384 compared to $50,374, a difference of 11.9%), wage/income gap (25.1% compared to 22.4%, a difference of 12.3%), and median female earnings ($39,871 compared to $33,291, a difference of 19.8%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Peru and Immigrants from Cuba communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (12.0% compared to 20.8%, a difference of 72.8%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (12.0% compared to 17.9%, a difference of 49.7%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (13.7% compared to 19.9%, a difference of 45.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (16.9% compared to 16.4%, a difference of 2.7%), single male poverty (11.5% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 5.6%), and single father poverty (15.3% compared to 16.4%, a difference of 6.6%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Peru and Immigrants from Cuba communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.4% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 20.5%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.4% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 20.2%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.6% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 20.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.2% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 0.15%), unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.7% compared to 16.6%, a difference of 6.8%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.7% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 8.9%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Peru and Immigrants from Cuba communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (34.2% compared to 30.2%, a difference of 12.9%), in labor force | age > 16 (66.3% compared to 64.1%, a difference of 3.5%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (74.5% compared to 72.0%, a difference of 3.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (84.9% compared to 84.9%, a difference of 0.070%), in labor force | age 45-54 (83.5% compared to 83.7%, a difference of 0.19%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (84.7% compared to 84.2%, a difference of 0.63%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Peru and Immigrants from Cuba communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (31.8% compared to 41.5%, a difference of 30.3%), divorced or separated (12.0% compared to 15.2%, a difference of 26.7%), and single mother households (6.7% compared to 7.5%, a difference of 13.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (67.2% compared to 68.2%, a difference of 1.4%), average family size (3.31 compared to 3.26, a difference of 1.5%), and currently married (46.4% compared to 43.7%, a difference of 6.2%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Peru and Immigrants from Cuba communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (11.5% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 31.9%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.4% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 12.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.4% compared to 18.8%, a difference of 3.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2 or more vehicles in household (54.4% compared to 55.3%, a difference of 1.7%), 1 or more vehicles in household (88.6% compared to 91.3%, a difference of 3.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.4% compared to 18.8%, a difference of 3.3%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Peru and Immigrants from Cuba communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.7% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 47.4%), master's degree (14.9% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 37.4%), and bachelor's degree (37.5% compared to 30.3%, a difference of 23.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.5% compared to 97.2%, a difference of 0.33%), kindergarten (97.5% compared to 97.1%, a difference of 0.35%), and 1st grade (97.4% compared to 97.1%, a difference of 0.35%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Peru and Immigrants from Cuba communities in the United States are seen in vision disability (2.1% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 18.6%), self-care disability (2.4% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 17.4%), and ambulatory disability (5.7% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 13.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 5 to 17 (5.3% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 1.0%), disability age 35 to 64 (9.8% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 1.2%), and cognitive disability (16.6% compared to 16.3%, a difference of 1.5%).