Alsatian vs Immigrants from Northern Africa Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 72,391,342 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Northern Africa within Alsatian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.145. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Alsatians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.127% in Immigrants from Northern Africa. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Alsatians corresponds to an increase of 126.7 Immigrants from Northern Africa.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Alsatian and Immigrants from Northern Africa communities in the United States are seen in householder income under 25 years ($49,267 compared to $53,185, a difference of 8.0%), median household income ($85,053 compared to $90,026, a difference of 5.9%), and median earnings ($47,023 compared to $49,648, a difference of 5.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income over 65 years ($61,797 compared to $62,522, a difference of 1.2%), per capita income ($47,284 compared to $46,531, a difference of 1.6%), and wage/income gap (24.7% compared to 25.2%, a difference of 2.3%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Alsatian and Immigrants from Northern Africa communities in the United States are seen in single male poverty (15.2% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 27.6%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (24.4% compared to 19.7%, a difference of 23.8%), and single female poverty (24.5% compared to 20.0%, a difference of 22.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple family poverty (5.2% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 0.020%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.6% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 0.89%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.3% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 2.6%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Alsatian and Immigrants from Northern Africa communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (6.1% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 33.6%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.8% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 24.0%), and unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (20.5% compared to 17.4%, a difference of 17.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.2% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 0.41%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.5% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 0.52%), and unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.3% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 1.8%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Alsatian and Immigrants from Northern Africa communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age > 16 (64.7% compared to 66.6%, a difference of 2.9%), in labor force | age 45-54 (81.3% compared to 83.3%, a difference of 2.4%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (83.9% compared to 85.2%, a difference of 1.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (85.2% compared to 85.2%, a difference of 0.0%), in labor force | age 20-24 (74.8% compared to 74.6%, a difference of 0.20%), and in labor force | age 16-19 (35.9% compared to 35.9%, a difference of 0.21%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Alsatian and Immigrants from Northern Africa communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (33.8% compared to 29.5%, a difference of 14.6%), family households with children (25.3% compared to 27.8%, a difference of 10.0%), and divorced or separated (11.9% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 3.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother households (6.2% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 0.090%), single father households (2.1% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 0.22%), and currently married (45.7% compared to 46.5%, a difference of 1.6%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Alsatian and Immigrants from Northern Africa communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (5.4% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 4.4%), no vehicles in household (13.2% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 4.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.0% compared to 17.8%, a difference of 1.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2 or more vehicles in household (52.5% compared to 52.3%, a difference of 0.30%), 1 or more vehicles in household (87.1% compared to 87.4%, a difference of 0.41%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.0% compared to 17.8%, a difference of 1.1%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Alsatian and Immigrants from Northern Africa communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.0% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 9.7%), professional degree (5.2% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 2.9%), and bachelor's degree (41.0% compared to 41.9%, a difference of 2.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of high school diploma (89.4% compared to 89.4%, a difference of 0.010%), 11th grade (92.6% compared to 92.6%, a difference of 0.030%), and 12th grade, no diploma (91.3% compared to 91.4%, a difference of 0.10%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Alsatian and Immigrants from Northern Africa communities in the United States are seen in vision disability (2.3% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 16.2%), disability age 35 to 64 (11.8% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 14.8%), and disability age 18 to 34 (7.0% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 14.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (47.3% compared to 46.7%, a difference of 1.3%), self-care disability (2.4% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 1.4%), and disability age 65 to 74 (22.8% compared to 22.4%, a difference of 1.9%).