Chinese vs Immigrants from Northern Africa Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 57,001,190 people shows a significant negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Northern Africa within Chinese communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.679. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Chinese within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.196% in Immigrants from Northern Africa. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Chinese corresponds to a decrease of 195.9 Immigrants from Northern Africa.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Chinese and Immigrants from Northern Africa communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($77,465 compared to $62,522, a difference of 23.9%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($116,156 compared to $105,430, a difference of 10.2%), and median household income ($98,496 compared to $90,026, a difference of 9.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of per capita income ($46,098 compared to $46,531, a difference of 0.94%), median female earnings ($41,461 compared to $42,084, a difference of 1.5%), and median earnings ($48,836 compared to $49,648, a difference of 1.7%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Chinese and Immigrants from Northern Africa communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (3.6% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 42.9%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (9.1% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 37.4%), and family poverty (6.5% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 35.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (15.4% compared to 15.3%, a difference of 0.35%), single male poverty (11.0% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 8.8%), and receiving food stamps (9.8% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 12.5%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Chinese and Immigrants from Northern Africa communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (5.9% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 38.2%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.2% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 24.2%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (4.4% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 22.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.1% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 0.80%), unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.1% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 2.8%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.3% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 5.6%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Chinese and Immigrants from Northern Africa communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.6% compared to 35.9%, a difference of 7.4%), in labor force | age 20-24 (77.3% compared to 74.6%, a difference of 3.5%), and in labor force | age > 16 (64.7% compared to 66.6%, a difference of 3.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (85.0% compared to 85.2%, a difference of 0.19%), in labor force | age 35-44 (85.1% compared to 84.8%, a difference of 0.27%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (80.7% compared to 80.3%, a difference of 0.48%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Chinese and Immigrants from Northern Africa communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.2% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 19.7%), married-couple households (50.4% compared to 46.0%, a difference of 9.6%), and single father households (2.0% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 8.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of births to unmarried women (30.2% compared to 29.5%, a difference of 2.5%), divorced or separated (11.2% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 2.7%), and average family size (3.34 compared to 3.22, a difference of 3.6%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Chinese and Immigrants from Northern Africa communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (8.8% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 56.7%), no vehicles in household (8.2% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 53.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (23.9% compared to 17.8%, a difference of 34.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.9% compared to 87.4%, a difference of 5.0%), 2 or more vehicles in household (60.1% compared to 52.3%, a difference of 14.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (23.9% compared to 17.8%, a difference of 34.2%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Chinese and Immigrants from Northern Africa communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.5% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 48.7%), doctorate degree (1.8% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 20.0%), and master's degree (14.6% compared to 17.1%, a difference of 17.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of college, 1 year or more (62.2% compared to 61.9%, a difference of 0.55%), nursery school (98.6% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.75%), and kindergarten (98.5% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.76%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Chinese and Immigrants from Northern Africa communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (3.7% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 33.6%), male disability (12.1% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 15.8%), and ambulatory disability (6.5% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 13.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 35 to 64 (10.3% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 0.13%), vision disability (2.0% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 1.5%), and disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 2.0%).