Indian (Asian) vs Immigrants from Northern Africa Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 314,619,484 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Northern Africa within Indian (Asian) communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.102. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Indians (Asian) within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.002% in Immigrants from Northern Africa. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Indians (Asian) corresponds to a decrease of 1.7 Immigrants from Northern Africa.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Indian (Asian) and Immigrants from Northern Africa communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($119,496 compared to $99,232, a difference of 20.4%), median household income ($105,262 compared to $90,026, a difference of 16.9%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($122,343 compared to $105,430, a difference of 16.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (26.4% compared to 25.2%, a difference of 4.8%), householder income under 25 years ($58,239 compared to $53,185, a difference of 9.5%), and median female earnings ($46,481 compared to $42,084, a difference of 10.4%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Indian (Asian) and Immigrants from Northern Africa communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (13.4% compared to 16.4%, a difference of 21.6%), child poverty among boys under 16 (13.3% compared to 16.0%, a difference of 20.7%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (13.1% compared to 15.8%, a difference of 20.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.6% compared to 19.7%, a difference of 0.45%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.1% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 0.96%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.7% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 2.3%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Indian (Asian) and Immigrants from Northern Africa communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.3% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 17.8%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (7.7% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 12.4%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (4.9% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 10.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.3% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 0.010%), unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.5% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 0.11%), and male unemployment (5.2% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 0.29%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Indian (Asian) and Immigrants from Northern Africa communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (31.9% compared to 35.9%, a difference of 12.8%), in labor force | age 20-24 (71.9% compared to 74.6%, a difference of 3.8%), and in labor force | age > 16 (65.5% compared to 66.6%, a difference of 1.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 45-54 (83.3% compared to 83.3%, a difference of 0.010%), in labor force | age 35-44 (84.8% compared to 84.8%, a difference of 0.050%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (85.4% compared to 85.2%, a difference of 0.24%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Indian (Asian) and Immigrants from Northern Africa communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.1% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 21.0%), births to unmarried women (25.3% compared to 29.5%, a difference of 16.8%), and divorced or separated (10.2% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 12.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.24 compared to 3.22, a difference of 0.62%), family households with children (27.6% compared to 27.8%, a difference of 0.82%), and family households (65.1% compared to 63.5%, a difference of 2.5%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Indian (Asian) and Immigrants from Northern Africa communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.4% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 13.9%), no vehicles in household (14.1% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 11.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.1% compared to 17.8%, a difference of 7.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2 or more vehicles in household (53.1% compared to 52.3%, a difference of 1.5%), 1 or more vehicles in household (86.0% compared to 87.4%, a difference of 1.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.1% compared to 17.8%, a difference of 7.5%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Indian (Asian) and Immigrants from Northern Africa communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (2.9% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 37.4%), professional degree (6.5% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 28.9%), and master's degree (20.5% compared to 17.1%, a difference of 19.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 11th grade (92.5% compared to 92.6%, a difference of 0.060%), nursery school (97.6% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.20%), and kindergarten (97.6% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.20%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Indian (Asian) and Immigrants from Northern Africa communities in the United States are seen in disability age 5 to 17 (4.6% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 16.7%), disability age 35 to 64 (8.9% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 16.2%), and disability age under 5 (1.0% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 16.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of self-care disability (2.3% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 0.39%), disability age over 75 (46.5% compared to 46.7%, a difference of 0.47%), and hearing disability (2.7% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 1.8%).