Icelander vs Immigrants from Northern Africa Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 128,690,823 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Northern Africa within Icelander communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.295. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Icelanders within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.027% in Immigrants from Northern Africa. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Icelanders corresponds to an increase of 26.6 Immigrants from Northern Africa.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Icelander and Immigrants from Northern Africa communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (27.5% compared to 25.2%, a difference of 8.8%), median female earnings ($39,109 compared to $42,084, a difference of 7.6%), and median earnings ($46,916 compared to $49,648, a difference of 5.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income over 65 years ($61,270 compared to $62,522, a difference of 2.0%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($102,261 compared to $105,430, a difference of 3.1%), and per capita income ($44,987 compared to $46,531, a difference of 3.4%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Icelander and Immigrants from Northern Africa communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (4.5% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 15.1%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (21.5% compared to 19.7%, a difference of 9.2%), and single female poverty (21.6% compared to 20.0%, a difference of 8.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of child poverty under the age of 5 (16.3% compared to 16.4%, a difference of 0.090%), male poverty (11.0% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 0.96%), and female poverty (13.0% compared to 13.2%, a difference of 1.7%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Icelander and Immigrants from Northern Africa communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (7.0% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 16.2%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.9% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 8.3%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.1% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 7.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.4% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 0.32%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.7% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 0.35%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.3% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 0.73%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Icelander and Immigrants from Northern Africa communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (40.8% compared to 35.9%, a difference of 13.5%), in labor force | age 20-24 (76.9% compared to 74.6%, a difference of 3.0%), and in labor force | age > 16 (65.6% compared to 66.6%, a difference of 1.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (84.7% compared to 85.2%, a difference of 0.52%), in labor force | age 25-29 (84.8% compared to 85.2%, a difference of 0.54%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (82.8% compared to 83.3%, a difference of 0.66%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Icelander and Immigrants from Northern Africa communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.3% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 8.1%), divorced or separated (12.0% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 4.3%), and single mother households (6.0% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 3.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (63.3% compared to 63.5%, a difference of 0.42%), family households with children (27.6% compared to 27.8%, a difference of 0.71%), and average family size (3.19 compared to 3.22, a difference of 1.2%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Icelander and Immigrants from Northern Africa communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (9.6% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 31.0%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.4% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 30.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.5% compared to 17.8%, a difference of 21.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.5% compared to 87.4%, a difference of 3.5%), 2 or more vehicles in household (58.0% compared to 52.3%, a difference of 10.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.5% compared to 17.8%, a difference of 21.0%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Icelander and Immigrants from Northern Africa communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.7% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 25.6%), master's degree (15.5% compared to 17.1%, a difference of 10.2%), and bachelor's degree (39.5% compared to 41.9%, a difference of 6.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of college, 1 year or more (62.1% compared to 61.9%, a difference of 0.38%), nursery school (98.3% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.52%), and kindergarten (98.3% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.53%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Icelander and Immigrants from Northern Africa communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (3.2% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 16.2%), disability age 18 to 34 (7.1% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 16.1%), and male disability (11.6% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 11.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (46.7% compared to 46.7%, a difference of 0.010%), self-care disability (2.4% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 0.48%), and cognitive disability (17.6% compared to 17.3%, a difference of 1.9%).