Panamanian vs Immigrants from Northern Africa Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 214,948,102 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Northern Africa within Panamanian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.424. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Panamanians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.033% in Immigrants from Northern Africa. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Panamanians corresponds to an increase of 32.8 Immigrants from Northern Africa.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Panamanian and Immigrants from Northern Africa communities in the United States are seen in median family income ($97,683 compared to $108,161, a difference of 10.7%), per capita income ($42,035 compared to $46,531, a difference of 10.7%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($90,193 compared to $99,232, a difference of 10.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($51,611 compared to $53,185, a difference of 3.0%), wage/income gap (24.4% compared to 25.2%, a difference of 3.5%), and householder income over 65 years ($58,266 compared to $62,522, a difference of 7.3%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Panamanian and Immigrants from Northern Africa communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (13.1% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 19.2%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (14.2% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 12.7%), and family poverty (9.8% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 11.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.7% compared to 19.7%, a difference of 0.040%), single mother poverty (29.6% compared to 28.0%, a difference of 5.9%), and married-couple family poverty (5.6% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 6.8%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Panamanian and Immigrants from Northern Africa communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (7.0% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 12.5%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.8% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 11.7%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.1% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 11.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.7% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 0.86%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.2% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 1.0%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.4% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 1.9%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Panamanian and Immigrants from Northern Africa communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age > 16 (65.3% compared to 66.6%, a difference of 1.9%), in labor force | age 20-64 (79.1% compared to 80.3%, a difference of 1.5%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (82.2% compared to 83.3%, a difference of 1.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (74.7% compared to 74.6%, a difference of 0.16%), in labor force | age 16-19 (36.1% compared to 35.9%, a difference of 0.61%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (84.0% compared to 84.8%, a difference of 1.0%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Panamanian and Immigrants from Northern Africa communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (34.2% compared to 29.5%, a difference of 15.9%), single mother households (7.1% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 15.2%), and single father households (2.4% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 10.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.25 compared to 3.22, a difference of 0.92%), family households with children (28.2% compared to 27.8%, a difference of 1.3%), and married-couple households (45.2% compared to 46.0%, a difference of 1.7%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Panamanian and Immigrants from Northern Africa communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.0% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 7.0%), 3 or more vehicles in household (18.8% compared to 17.8%, a difference of 5.5%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (53.5% compared to 52.3%, a difference of 2.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (87.5% compared to 87.4%, a difference of 0.11%), no vehicles in household (12.5% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 0.55%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (53.5% compared to 52.3%, a difference of 2.3%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Panamanian and Immigrants from Northern Africa communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.7% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 27.9%), professional degree (4.1% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 22.2%), and master's degree (14.4% compared to 17.1%, a difference of 18.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 9th grade (94.7% compared to 94.7%, a difference of 0.010%), 8th grade (95.6% compared to 95.5%, a difference of 0.050%), and 5th grade (97.3% compared to 97.2%, a difference of 0.080%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Panamanian and Immigrants from Northern Africa communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (11.9% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 15.7%), vision disability (2.3% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 15.3%), and disability age under 5 (1.3% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 12.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (47.9% compared to 46.7%, a difference of 2.4%), cognitive disability (17.8% compared to 17.3%, a difference of 2.8%), and female disability (12.4% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 8.2%).