Lithuanian vs Immigrants from Northern Africa Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 283,846,098 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Northern Africa within Lithuanian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.665. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Lithuanians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.082% in Immigrants from Northern Africa. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Lithuanians corresponds to an increase of 82.5 Immigrants from Northern Africa.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Lithuanian and Immigrants from Northern Africa communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (28.7% compared to 25.2%, a difference of 13.9%), median family income ($115,395 compared to $108,161, a difference of 6.7%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($112,484 compared to $105,430, a difference of 6.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($42,108 compared to $42,084, a difference of 0.060%), householder income under 25 years ($53,552 compared to $53,185, a difference of 0.69%), and median earnings ($50,991 compared to $49,648, a difference of 2.7%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Lithuanian and Immigrants from Northern Africa communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (4.0% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 31.6%), family poverty (7.2% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 22.5%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (9.1% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 21.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother poverty (27.4% compared to 28.0%, a difference of 2.2%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (12.2% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 3.0%), and single female poverty (19.2% compared to 20.0%, a difference of 4.1%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Lithuanian and Immigrants from Northern Africa communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.9% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 21.0%), female unemployment (4.7% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 9.4%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.4% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 8.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.2% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 0.65%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.4% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 1.2%), and unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.7% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 1.3%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Lithuanian and Immigrants from Northern Africa communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (40.4% compared to 35.9%, a difference of 12.5%), in labor force | age 20-24 (77.0% compared to 74.6%, a difference of 3.1%), and in labor force | age > 16 (64.8% compared to 66.6%, a difference of 2.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-64 (80.2% compared to 80.3%, a difference of 0.050%), in labor force | age 45-54 (83.6% compared to 83.3%, a difference of 0.34%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (85.2% compared to 84.8%, a difference of 0.43%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Lithuanian and Immigrants from Northern Africa communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.4% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 13.7%), married-couple households (48.9% compared to 46.0%, a difference of 6.4%), and currently married (49.0% compared to 46.5%, a difference of 5.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of births to unmarried women (29.6% compared to 29.5%, a difference of 0.14%), family households (64.0% compared to 63.5%, a difference of 0.83%), and single father households (2.1% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 1.5%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Lithuanian and Immigrants from Northern Africa communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (8.4% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 49.4%), 3 or more vehicles in household (20.1% compared to 17.8%, a difference of 13.2%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (6.3% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 12.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.7% compared to 87.4%, a difference of 4.9%), 2 or more vehicles in household (58.2% compared to 52.3%, a difference of 11.3%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (6.3% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 12.0%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Lithuanian and Immigrants from Northern Africa communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.4% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 52.5%), doctorate degree (2.3% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 6.6%), and professional degree (5.4% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 6.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of bachelor's degree (42.2% compared to 41.9%, a difference of 0.73%), nursery school (98.6% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.81%), and kindergarten (98.6% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.82%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Lithuanian and Immigrants from Northern Africa communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.6% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 34.1%), hearing disability (3.4% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 21.7%), and disability age 18 to 34 (7.0% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 13.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of self-care disability (2.4% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 0.14%), vision disability (2.0% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 1.1%), and disability age over 75 (45.1% compared to 46.7%, a difference of 3.7%).